We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

"Reasonable" mourners expenses

2»

Comments

  • g6jns_2
    g6jns_2 Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    comeandgo wrote: »
    Maybe our understanding of the word wake is the problem? I take a wake to mean mourning prior to burial so not allowable?
    A good point. I think the term has been mis-used, and I include myself, to mean a post funeral social gathering. In fact it refers to a pre funeral gathering. The word means to keep watch so it can also mean a vigil before the funeral.
  • ferger
    ferger Posts: 85 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think that strictly you're right - but nowadays it seems to be commonly used to mean 'post-funeral session', which is how I meant it. But HMRC are never going to extend the words beyond 'refreshments for mourners after the service' :-)

    My understanding - based entirely on hearsay - was always that funeral expenses were allowable, but nothing beyond that. I was quite surprised to read the words in the IHT400 guidance last night, hence the original question.
  • ferger
    ferger Posts: 85 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Heh. Snap, G6
  • ferger wrote: »
    Well, the guidance notes for the IHT400 quite specifically reference as allowable:

    "refreshments provided for the mourners after the service"

    So it's hard to see that only costs directly attributable to the funeral itself will be entertained.

    And the estate is over the IHT threshold, so it does matter!

    I completed the IHT400 as the estate was over the threshold, and listed (with copy of receipts) the funeral tea costs - which weren't queried, although a couple of other figures were, elsewhere in the return - so it obviously the whole return had been scrutinised closely.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    £13pp is reasonable a basic catered event with sarnies and tea would be £6-£10pp anyway.

    picking a random caterer from a google search for funeral catering.

    They offer £5-£13 so £13 with some alcohol is well within the norm

    http://www.redcherrycatering.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=58&Itemid=13


    We used the single billing service out FD offered for no extra charge(no discount for not using it), they collect all invoices for catering, flowers etc. sending a single collated invoice for payment.

    IF HMRC are not happy they will let you know

    Probably reasonable to have the invoice mention numbers to put the total in context.
  • Claimed for the cost of the wake without any problems two years ago. It got listed separately in the "other costs" box in the funeral costs section (question 81 then) so very easily identifiable. The estate was well over the IHT level so someone would have looked at it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.