We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
help with letting agent wanting access to market house
journeymanpro
Posts: 37 Forumite
Hello
I need some advice regarding a concern I have.
We have been renting the same property for 4.5 years now on a periodic tenancy. The agent served a valid s21 for us to move out on or by the 28th April 15 as the landlord wants to sell the property. We have somewhere else to go so gave our one months notice in return with a move out date of 28th maRch.
Today, the agent has left a message on my partners answerphone stating they need to visit the property in order to prepare sales details etc. I rang the agent back and they are saying they have a legal right to enter the property with or without us Within the last 28 days of the tenancy. Is this correct?
As far as I am concerned they are not entering the property until the day of our checkout as we are already being accomodating by leaving a month earlier than we have to. The property is in good order but could do with a good clean up which we had planned to do before moving out. It's also a bit of a mess as we have furniture split down ready to move and such like.
BasicalLy, am I within my legal rights to refuse entry?
Thanks in advance.
I need some advice regarding a concern I have.
We have been renting the same property for 4.5 years now on a periodic tenancy. The agent served a valid s21 for us to move out on or by the 28th April 15 as the landlord wants to sell the property. We have somewhere else to go so gave our one months notice in return with a move out date of 28th maRch.
Today, the agent has left a message on my partners answerphone stating they need to visit the property in order to prepare sales details etc. I rang the agent back and they are saying they have a legal right to enter the property with or without us Within the last 28 days of the tenancy. Is this correct?
As far as I am concerned they are not entering the property until the day of our checkout as we are already being accomodating by leaving a month earlier than we have to. The property is in good order but could do with a good clean up which we had planned to do before moving out. It's also a bit of a mess as we have furniture split down ready to move and such like.
BasicalLy, am I within my legal rights to refuse entry?
Thanks in advance.
0
Comments
-
Yes. It will take then longer than 28 days to get legal entry through the courts."Dream World" by The B Sharps....describes a lot of the posts in the Loans and Mortgage sections !!!0
-
journeymanpro wrote: »Hello
I need some advice regarding a concern I have.
We have been renting the same property for 4.5 years now on a periodic tenancy. The agent served a valid s21 for us to move out on or by the 28th April 15 as the landlord wants to sell the property. We have somewhere else to go so gave our one months notice in return with a move out date of 28th maRch.
Today, the agent has left a message on my partners answerphone stating they need to visit the property in order to prepare sales details etc. I rang the agent back and they are saying they have a legal right to enter the property with or without us Within the last 28 days of the tenancy. Is this correct?
As far as I am concerned they are not entering the property until the day of our checkout as we are already being accomodating by leaving a month earlier than we have to. The property is in good order but could do with a good clean up which we had planned to do before moving out. It's also a bit of a mess as we have furniture split down ready to move and such like.
BasicalLy, am I within my legal rights to refuse entry?
Thanks in advance.
Lets forget 'legal rights' for the moment.
You can physically change the locks.
The LL / LA cannot change them back without risking a huge claim for harassment and a breach under the protection from eviction act.
It will take longer than 25 days for them to go to court to get the court to tell you to change the locks back.
.....
Conclusion change the locks. and tell the agent that the response to their request is the same as given in: arkell vs. pressdram
- OR
be courteous, arrange access for them, and make it clear that you will be leaving in 25 days. The LL may wish to sell, but it is your home for that time. If the LLs wishes to actively sell, IE have viewings, then they should knock off some of the rent (30% i think is reasonable) but really it depends on the number of viewings.0 -
You are in a VERY strong negotiating position.
A s21 notice does not end a tenancy nor require a tenant to leave: It merely permits a landlord to start court possession proceedings on expiry: Likely a couple of months or more.
If landlord wants to sell then being delayed will be a big, expensive, deal for him. In your shoes I would contact landlord direct & enquire for how much he would be willing to guarantee your going by any particular date: It's only "free enterprise" so what's wrong with that eh??
However, if all goes wrong you may have court fees (say £280) & no reference.
And many, many s21s are invalid anyway.
Cheers!0 -
journeymanpro wrote:Hello
I need some advice regarding a concern I have.
We have been renting the same property for 4.5 years now on a periodic tenancy. The agent served a valid s21 for us to move out on or by the 28th April 15 as the landlord wants to sell the property. We have somewhere else to go so gave our one months notice in return with a move out date of 28th maRch.
Today, the agent has left a message on my partners answerphone stating they need to visit the property in order to prepare sales details etc. I rang the agent back and they are saying they have a legal right to enter the property with or without us Within the last 28 days of the tenancy. Is this correct?
As far as I am concerned they are not entering the property until the day of our checkout as we are already being accomodating by leaving a month earlier than we have to. The property is in good order but could do with a good clean up which we had planned to do before moving out. It's also a bit of a mess as we have furniture split down ready to move and such like.
BasicalLy, am I within my legal rights to refuse entry?
Thanks in advance.
Yes ..................Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0 -
What does your tenancy agreement say You agreed to this when you signed it.
you are also being unreasonable. You are not
a) you don't have to leave on expiry of a S21 andbeing accomodating by leaving a month earlier than we have to.
b) you are leaving when you chose to leave (ie on the basis of your own notice)
Apart from that, it is also perfectly reasonable to expect the landlord to want to prepare for your departure, provided he too is reasonable.
Reach a compromise whereby you accept occassional, limted access, at times convenient to you. Your home life is interrupted minimally, and the LL's access is controlled.
I never understand why these scenarios have to be confrontational. Try communicating and compromising.0 -
I don't want to be too awkward but we are not comfortable having anyone in until we have left. We do need to consider the deposit they currently have of ours though. We have also given notice, does that override the s21? I have checked the recieved s21 and it looks to be valid.
A reference is not needed as we are moving in with family to allow us to save for a mortgage deposit.
Would it be wise to change the locks for now and refit originals on departure?0 -
We also never recieved a copy of the contract. I should of chased it up I know. All we have is the invetory and the pi info for deposit.0
-
If your own notice is correctly served it is legally binding on both parties and ends the tenancy.
A S21 is not a notice to quit so does not end a tenancy.
Interesting thought...:
If a tenancy agreement specifies that the deposit can be used for any llandlord losses resulting from a tenant breaching the terms of the contract, can the LL make deductions from the deposit for his consequentil costs if the tenant denies access in contravention of the tenancy terms ie that LL can have access, in the last, say, 28 days of the tenancy, following 24 hours written notice............
:think:0 -
Interesting thought...:
If a tenancy agreement specifies that the deposit can be used for any llandlord losses resulting from a tenant breaching the terms of the contract, can the LL make deductions from the deposit for his consequentil costs if the tenant denies access in contravention of the tenancy terms ie that LL can have access, in the last, say, 28 days of the tenancy, following 24 hours written notice............
:think:
What consequential losses are you thinking of and how would their existence be proved?0 -
I guess I'm thinking of delays in marketing and hence lost rent. Could also be charges made by, say a letting agent or Valuer for an abortive visit if the locks were changed.
No real idea how you'd prove, but that's a supplementary question. If the issue is accepted at law, then it is for a court to assess the evidence as to proof.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
