We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
SUV/Cross Over Required?
Comments
-
I would almost get a CRV with my eyes closed but the insurance cost on that for me is about 1k+ and dont really want to spend so much on insurance0
-
Strider590 wrote: »Or you could have an MPV, which is the same, but with more seating and more boot space.
It isn't the same. Ground clearance is the problem, not the size of the boot.0 -
I've had good experiences of the 1.4 petrol Yeti with DSG. Having said that, the gearbox wasn't its best feature. Not a patch on a conventional auto. The clutch juddered at low speeds.0
-
I'd only ever tried the 1.2dsg and it also had some clutch judder.
I don't think the 1.4 as a dsg existed in the uk at the time i originally purchased.
I'd be wary of the DSG if it was a car i was buying but as the OP talked about leasing i'd be less inclined to be concerned.
Overall i thought it was a good car and i only didn't get another because the engines on the facelift models felt behind the times in terms of fuel economy and emissions.0 -
Gloomendoom wrote: »It isn't the same. Ground clearance is the problem, not the size of the boot.
I don't see where the OP said he needed ground clearance, so an MPV might be a suitable alternative and cheaper in many ways.
OP: I just bought a C3 Picasso and it might suit the needs you described. Unless you are particularly interested in an SUV/cross-over for its looks?
The C3 Picasso ha a 1.6 L petrol automatic version.(Nearly) dunroving0 -
I don't see where the OP said he needed ground clearance, so an MPV might be a suitable alternative and cheaper in many ways.
I agree. An MPV would very probably be the best car for the OP. However, my post was in response to Strider590's lack of awareness. Particularly of the practical reasons for choosing to buy an SUV.0 -
Golf or Focus estate whould have enough space for a family of four.
Or a Mondeo or Passat if you need a little more. I can fit more in my Mondeo estate than my dad can in his Transit Connect.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0 -
Gloomendoom wrote: »I agree. An MPV would very probably be the best car for the OP. However, my post was in response to Strider590's lack of awareness. Particularly of the practical reasons for choosing to buy an SUV.
There is no practical reason, it's a compromise and an expensive one.
It's not good at anything, it's got ground clearance but it's not an off road and it's big with no boot space. It's like buying a sportscar with a crappy engine. It's attempts to be a bit of one thing and a bit of something else, but fails miserably at both.“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
Strider590 wrote: »Most of them have less interior and boot space than a medium sized family hatchback.
Yes buckling the children into their child seats is easier as there's less bending down, but that's about it. Unless you count the "king of the road" driving position. He doesn't live on an unmade road, so ground clearance isn't an issue.
I've got an Audi A6 estate (but no children), mine has far greater load carrying capacity. Cost less to buy as well, as it's now 13 years old (I know people don't like driving cars that are old enough to require an MOT though, "in case they break down":eek: ).Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 20230 -
Strider590 wrote: »There is no practical reason, it's a compromise and an expensive one.
It's not good at anything, it's got ground clearance but it's not an off road and it's big with no boot space. It's like buying a sportscar with a crappy engine. It's attempts to be a bit of one thing and a bit of something else, but fails miserably at both.
Why are you so obsessed with boot space? How much off-road driving do you actually do?
All cars present a compromise to some degree. We chose an SUV because it presented us with the least compromise out of all the alternatives. After three years ownership, I'm happy to say that we made the right choice. It suits our needs admirably.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards