We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Chargeback (defective holidays accommodation - absence of water)

I rented and prepaid the accommodation for 7 nights by Visa Card. There were a lot of misleading information on the website about the accommodation. Anyway in order not to screw up our holidays we accepted this.

However, on the third day of staying we met the absence of the water. So it was not possible to use bathroom and toilet at all. We informed the manager in UK and local manager. However, nobody came the same day. Moreover, we did not see local manager anymore at all. He did not come to see the situation and confirm the absence of water. He disappeared and did not answer the phone at all.

To make the story shorter, the problem has not been fixed tor the next days. Every evening we encountered the absence of the water and every day they told us that it will be fixed again tomorrow.
They did not provide us with any alternative accommodation and did not agree to return money for the rest of prepaid nights. So we did not have the water for 4 nights.

Could you please advise if the Visa Regulation consider such service as defective under Code Reason 53 and could I aply for chargeback in my bank?


Many thanks!

Comments

  • grumbler
    grumbler Posts: 58,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't think that it's realistic to rely on chargeback in such complicated case. The bank isn't a judge and isn't in a position to decide whether the services were actually 'defective' because of far too many factors involved. Also, the chargeback can be only the full amount, partial refunds are impossible.

    Section 75 claim would be far more realistic. That's why it's always advised to pay, at least partly, by a credit card.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.9K Life & Family
  • 260.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.