We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Prankster fails to beat around the bush!

2

Comments

  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    PP forgot :

    > Corrupting local planning conditions set by Brighton & Hove Council by constantly applying ( via their 'employer' Aldi ) to get the time limit reduced from 3 hours to the Parking Eye standard of 90 minutes. When rejected despite locals not wanting a reduction they appealed to the planning inspectorate - who strangely have a building right next to ...... Capita !!!!!
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Hot_Bring wrote: »
    PP forgot :

    > Corrupting local planning conditions set by Brighton & Hove Council ... appealed to the planning inspectorate - who strangely have a building right next to ...... Capita !!!!!

    This already has a thread of its own, why are you spamming this one?
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • trisontana
    trisontana Posts: 9,472 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 22 February 2015 at 12:39PM
    A year or so ago Parking Prankster received a letter from a third-party firm of solicitors who had been employed by Parking Eye. The letter informed PP that he had been "reported to the police" over some of his blogs about PE. When PP asked for the crime number and the location of the police station where this "crime" had been reported, answer came there none. So it was just a hollow threat.
    What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?
  • Hot_Bring
    Hot_Bring Posts: 1,596 Forumite
    The_Deep wrote: »
    This already has a thread of its own, why are you spamming this one?

    Oh do behave. PP has listed PEs 'crimes' and all I've done is pointed out he missed one ..... how is that spamming ?
    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri
  • Guys_Dad
    Guys_Dad Posts: 11,025 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hot_Bring wrote: »
    Oh do behave. PP has listed PEs 'crimes' and all I've done is pointed out he missed one ..... how is that spamming ?

    Agreed. Don't understand Deep's argument.
  • hoohoo
    hoohoo Posts: 1,717 Forumite
    As I recall ParkingEye threatened to bring action for defamation and Pranky referred them to Arkell v Pressdram.
    http://www.nasw.org/users/nbauman/arkell.htm

    There were no more blogs following this so I presume ParkingEye took Pressdram's advice.
    Dedicated to driving up standards in parking
  • bazster
    bazster Posts: 7,436 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    James_N wrote: »
    Whatever the meaning of "defamatory" we can agree that the statements are highly damaging to a certain company.

    Not necessarily, you could argue that given PE is generally held in the same esteem as dog s**t stuck to your shoe they have no reputation to damage!
    Je suis Charlie.
  • What they have is "money" and in this country, justice at English courts is the best that money can buy.
    I do Contracts, all day every day.
  • Jim_AFCB
    Jim_AFCB Posts: 248 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary
    The_Deep wrote: »
    This already has a thread of its own, why are you spamming this one?

    ..because it is part of the subject in question?
    Bournemouth - home of the Mighty Cherries
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Jim_AFCB wrote: »
    ..because it is part of the subject in question?


    No it isn't.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.