We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Parking Prankster fails to beat around the bush!
Comments
-
PP forgot :
> Corrupting local planning conditions set by Brighton & Hove Council by constantly applying ( via their 'employer' Aldi ) to get the time limit reduced from 3 hours to the Parking Eye standard of 90 minutes. When rejected despite locals not wanting a reduction they appealed to the planning inspectorate - who strangely have a building right next to ...... Capita !!!!!"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri0 -
PP forgot :
> Corrupting local planning conditions set by Brighton & Hove Council ... appealed to the planning inspectorate - who strangely have a building right next to ...... Capita !!!!!
This already has a thread of its own, why are you spamming this one?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
A year or so ago Parking Prankster received a letter from a third-party firm of solicitors who had been employed by Parking Eye. The letter informed PP that he had been "reported to the police" over some of his blogs about PE. When PP asked for the crime number and the location of the police station where this "crime" had been reported, answer came there none. So it was just a hollow threat.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0
-
This already has a thread of its own, why are you spamming this one?
Oh do behave. PP has listed PEs 'crimes' and all I've done is pointed out he missed one ..... how is that spamming ?"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri0 -
As I recall ParkingEye threatened to bring action for defamation and Pranky referred them to Arkell v Pressdram.
http://www.nasw.org/users/nbauman/arkell.htm
There were no more blogs following this so I presume ParkingEye took Pressdram's advice.Dedicated to driving up standards in parking0 -
-
What they have is "money" and in this country, justice at English courts is the best that money can buy.I do Contracts, all day every day.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards