We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

NDR & VERY Debt Recovery for an item not received help?!

Really appreciate anyones help here!!

I ordered an iPad quite a while back now back in 2013 from Very. It never arrived and I only got an empty box. I complained to very.co.uk and they would not refund me. I contacted my bank and they suggested I raised a chargeback and I got my money back. I kept getting letters from Very stating I owe them the amount and if I do not pay I will be contacted by a debt company.
I contacted my bank and was told not to pay the debt as I had not received the device.

I now have a letter stating I have a default notice because of this amount from Very and NDR debt company. I contacted very again and the debt company, no one is helping me and my credit is still being affected by this. Whoever I speak to I keep getting turned away. I then contacted the head office of Very (Shop Direct) and explained the situation. They replied with lies saying I didn't reply to letters or emails (I did) and that because of the length of time they will not re investigate and I still need to pay the debt and that it may effect my credit score.

What do i do?! I never got the item so why should I pay the debt?! My bank even says do not pay it.
Any info would be great! :)
«1

Comments

  • DevCoder
    DevCoder Posts: 3,362 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Did you follow the companies (Very) complaint procedure? What was the outcome and did you escalate it (to the FOS) if you didn't receive an acceptable response?
  • rizla_king
    rizla_king Posts: 2,895 Forumite
    Still rolling rolling rolling...... :) <
    SIGNATURE - Not part of post
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    Here we go again: Very.

    This outfit is shaping up to be one of Britain's worst companies. Like all these "credit" providers they hold the credit score axe over your head. "Do it our way, and accept every thing we say, because we are always right, or we'll trash your credit record."

    DON'T BUY ANYTHING FROM VERY!

    And yet again this is an example of how the credit reference business is out of control and is, in some cases, wrecking people's financial lives.
  • krisdorey wrote: »
    Did you follow the companies (Very) complaint procedure? What was the outcome and did you escalate it (to the FOS) if you didn't receive an acceptable response?

    I emailed and called and tweeted them. They stated that the item was sent out. I then contacted the head office and they investigated and concluded that nothing could be done. I reported it to the FOS 2 weeks ago when i received a default notice letter. I did not do anything before that as i was advised by my bank to ignore letters and to not pay anything.
  • rizla_king
    rizla_king Posts: 2,895 Forumite
    kodiplod wrote: »
    i was advised by my bank

    Well that was stupid advice.

    And ignoring and not paying a debt without resolving the dispute and expecting that not to harm your credit file was a bit naive. Others might have done the same, but you did shoot yourself in the foot there.
    Still rolling rolling rolling...... :) <
    SIGNATURE - Not part of post
  • FOS is the correct thing to do here.

    If very didn't inform you of the complaints procedure etc, they will not be looked upon favourably.
    :beer:
  • shortcrust
    shortcrust Posts: 2,697 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Newshound!
    GingerBob wrote: »
    Here we go again: Very.

    This outfit is shaping up to be one of Britain's worst companies. Like all these "credit" providers they hold the credit score axe over your head. "Do it our way, and accept every thing we say, because we are always right, or we'll trash your credit record."

    DON'T BUY ANYTHING FROM VERY!

    And yet again this is an example of how the credit reference business is out of control and is, in some cases, wrecking people's financial lives.

    Most people on here who have problems with Very could have avoided those problems by opening, reading and paying their bills. The OP's problems could also have been easily avoided.
  • shortcrust wrote: »
    Most people on here who have problems with Very could have avoided those problems by opening, reading and paying their bills. The OP's problems could also have been easily avoided.

    Yes, but Verys customer service is abysmal. Many posts on here to back that up. Not everyone is clued up on what to do in the OPs circumstances.
    :beer:
  • GingerBob_3
    GingerBob_3 Posts: 3,659 Forumite
    shortcrust wrote: »
    Most people on here who have problems with Very could have avoided those problems by opening, reading and paying their bills. The OP's problems could also have been easily avoided.

    How? By paying for something she didn't receive, on pain of having her ability to obtain credit compromised? That's far from a satisfactory situation.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,327 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    GingerBob wrote: »
    How? By paying for something she didn't receive, on pain of having her ability to obtain credit compromised? That's far from a satisfactory situation.

    The problem will surely always be that Very will simply assume OP took the box, took out the ipad, then complained they hadn't received it (a common ebay scam unfortunately) so they would need evidence of tampering with the mail or broken seals out of the box etc - trouble with tablets being so light, it might not be obvious on receipt vs, say a laptop, that the box was empty and item pilfered - issue will always be proving it - bad situation for both

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.