We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

afraid landlord will take me to court

124»

Comments

  • jjlandlord wrote: »
    This is not relevant.

    They told you that they no longer acted for your landlord. From that moment on what they say no longer matters and you cannot claim that you followed their advice because you thought they still acted for your landlord.

    In that case the landlord has failed to notify me of the changes and is in breach of the law?
  • pyueck
    pyueck Posts: 426 Forumite
    meggles88 wrote: »
    Sorry its only because on the dispute form it states AGENT as well and I know you have to have tried to resolve the matter before going ahead with the claim

    I am not telling you again something that I have told you so many times.
  • pyueck wrote: »
    Meggles I am so confused with your posts, to be honest a lot of what you say makes no sense, I wish you would write more clearly. I have absolutely zero idea who your agent and landlord are?

    When you say 'first months rent' what property was this for, the place you have just moved into or the place you moved out of? Is it the latest agency or a previous one?

    If I were you I would write to the landlord on your deposit schemes website and ask them to refund it in 10 days. If this doesn't happen just dispute it.

    If the situation is really as complex as it sounds, I doubt anybody can work out where your deposit funds are, so best to ask for it, and if no luck dispute it and claim through them.

    Sorry i am dyslexic and struggle to put my thouhts into coherent sentences sometimes!

    I gave my notice and specified 15th january as my last date in the property (call it property x) I gave them permission to use the deposit for the period from 15th january until 15th february property x. However now it appears that they accepted the surrender of the tenancy i do not believe i owe rent for this period and would like my deposit returned. Does this make sense? I am so sorry for not being clearer!
  • pyueck
    pyueck Posts: 426 Forumite
    meggles88 wrote: »
    Sorry i am dyslexic and struggle to put my thouhts into coherent sentences sometimes!

    I gave my notice and specified 15th january as my last date in the property (call it property x) I gave them permission to use the deposit for the period from 15th january until 15th february property x. However now it appears that they accepted the surrender of the tenancy i do not believe i owe rent for this period and would like my deposit returned. Does this make sense? I am so sorry for not being clearer!

    So in what way is that the first months rent?

    Why would you agree that you would pay rent for a period after you had left?

    I would just ask for it back and then dispute it. See what the deposit scheme says, I reckon if you are deemed to have legally surrendered the property then this won't stand. This is especially if the agency was claiming you needed to pay rent after you had legally surrendered your tenancy.
  • pyueck wrote: »
    So in what way is that the first months rent?

    Why would you agree that you would pay rent for a period after you had left?

    I would just ask for it back and then dispute it. See what the deposit scheme says, I reckon if you are deemed to have legally surrendered the property then this won't stand. This is especially if the agency was claiming you needed to pay rent after you had legally surrendered your tenancy.

    I meant the first month of the remaining fixed term tenancy. And I agreed because i am an idiot! Thank you for all your help i will let you know how it goes!
  • pyueck
    pyueck Posts: 426 Forumite
    meggles88 wrote: »
    I meant the first month of the remaining fixed term tenancy. And I agreed because i am an idiot! Thank you for all your help i will let you know how it goes!

    No worries, my advice:

    1) ignore any requests for further rent unless it is a court claim (in which case come back here for advice)
    2) send by recorded post the landlord on the deposit form a letter giving them 10 days to return deposit
    3) if not returned in 10 days dispute it with the scheme.
    4) don't stress about it :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.