We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Shared ownership..are we making a mistake?
Comments
-
You need to answer jbainbridge..... Is the £10k worth an extra £10k to you! If not then you need to decide whether you are ok paying a premium but for no extra gain to you.0
-
So much good advice, which I really appreciate. Windofchange, you are so right, and it makes me cringe to think that I am considering giving in to the madness, and I am angry that we are hard working people who have been saving for years but still cannot afford to buy a house.
I am still waiting to find out what exactly the improvements were! I have a feeling we can try harder to negotiate on it. Thanks again0 -
:TWindofchange wrote: »
Help to buy, shared equity, government backed mortgages, key worker etc are all vehicles the powers that be are using to keep this whole thing afloat just a little longer. Instead of helping us all out and letting property fall to levels you and I could afford, they are protecting their buddies at the top of the pyramid from losses. As you can probably tell, it makes me angry. A functioning housing market shouldn't need a dozen or so props to allow the middle classes to buy somewhere to live.
I feel sorry for you as all you want to do is have somewhere to raise a family, and due to the past decade or so of greed and stupidity, you cannot. Who knows what prices will do in the future. I guess if it suits your budget and allows you a decent place to live then it's your call. For me personally, this madness cannot continue forever. The world is drowning in an ocean of debt, and something is going to give sooner or later. If the money you are spending is worth it for you so that you can paint the walls purple and hang a picture up, then so be it, but for me, this situation cannot go on much longer, and the fallout is going to be huge.
:T So many good points.
I think it's an utter travesty that people have to pay such astronomical prices for property these days, and the only option (for many,) is to rent privately, live with your folks for life, or wait an eternity for social housing! OR as the OP is doing, go for shared ownership! I wouldn't go for it personally, as I think there are too many negatives that have already been outlined. However, the OP, like many others, don't really have any options if they want to buy. It's kind of annoying that you are responsible for repairs though!
The people who arrange these shared ownerships schemes like to make sure that everything benefits them, don't they?!
In the late 1980s, you could buy a 2 bed semi in my area for about £30K, and converted into todays money, that is about £70K. Yet, that same house, is £145K - £150K. So unfair and so wrong. How is anyone supposed to buy now?! In addition to this, wages are less than they should be too. I was bringing home £140 a week in 1987 for a secretarial job. (35 hour week.) In today's money that's about £350! No way would a normal job pay that now!
No wonder people can barely afford to live now, let alone buy a house.
Back in the late 1960s, my parents bought their house on my dad's wage alone! Try doing THAT these days: buying a house on one wage. Fat chance.
No debt left now. Saved £111 in our sealed pot last year. And £272.13 this year! Also we have £2300 in savings. :j
SPC #468
Target £250 for 2015.0 -
Do you have family there? If it's just friends... you can make new ones, as can your kids. You're clearly all nice enough people to have been able to do it once, so I wouldn't have any worries on that score.
I think that sometimes people limit their own horizons without meaning to. Pick a town or two outside of London where you would be able to commute to wherever you work now, do the maths (i.e. how much would you have to pay for commuting - if you can't get similar jobs locally - because that'll be money that will no longer be available to pay a mortgage/rent), and book a few appointments to see some properties there.
If, once you've seen what you could have 100% ownership of, you still want to stay put, then so be it - at least you've made a fully informed choice.
(I have no advice on the shared ownership thing that hasn't already been given.)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards