We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
New RCD Distribution box installation
Comments
-
brightontraveller wrote: »Electrician in this instance appears to be full of BS and not British Standard type [FONT="]If [FONT="]spouting [/FONT][/FONT][FONT="]London[/FONT][FONT="] fire brigade[/FONT]
It was the London Fire Brigade who approached JPEL/64 (the Committee which writes the Wiring Regulations) to have this Regulation included.0 -
-
brightontraveller wrote: »BS 7671 as you should know is none statuary
And where have I suggested that it is a Statutory document?0 -
And where did I say you did? If you want to believe its down to the London Fire brigade then carry on ....And where have I suggested that it is a Statutory document?
If you read the OP post the electrician is spouting on about “Yeah, he was saying that the London fire brigade have been doing tests and the outcome is that in Jan 2016 plastic is no longer acceptable. Boards will have to be metal or housed in a metal box so any fire self extinquishes or something” and “He was actually surprised that it was allowed to be sold to us like this as there are laws around selling houses and making sure everything is certified apparently” .... absolute baloney .even if it was in the regs as there not Statutory he is talking out of his !!!! .... The price is high poster mentions nothing about any test results lack of that info and what electrician stated as law I’d say scare mongering plenty of them about and most end up causing more crap than they cure0 -
brightontraveller wrote: »And where did I say you did? If you want to believe its down to the London Fire brigade then carry on ....
It is. JPEL/64 didn't just introduce the Regulation because they thought it would be funny.0 -
I’d imagine lots of cowboys spouting junk to get works that don’t need doing with the clients ending up with a less safe installation at the end so definitely a comedic value... Much like Part PIt is. JPEL/64 didn't just introduce the Regulation because they thought it would be funny.0 -
Just a comment on the new regs due to come in on Jan 16.
At a contractors meeting earlier and there was not one contractor who thought the amendment on consumer units was a good idea
Most were of the opinion that the powers that be were trying to regulate bad workmanship (the cause of loose connections and most fires)
It was noted that there was not a marked increase in electrical fires in Scotland or some other parts of the UK attributed to consumer units.baldly going on...0 -
It is certainly a hot topic discussed during my training courses, baldelectrician.
Not much positivity offered up during those either!"Part P" is not, and has never been, an accredited electrical qualification. It is a Building Regulation. No one can be "Part P qualified."
Forum posts are not legal advice; are for educational and discussion purposes only, and are not a substitute for proper consultation with a competent, qualified advisor.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards