📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Claiming from a card that no longer excists

Some 12 years ago in my much youth I was silly enough to take out a store/credit card called 'Style' This was run by I believe RBOS.
I have spend quite a lot of time of this board reading claim from years ago against them and I have discovered that Style is no longer in business and haven't been for some years.
From what I can remember I closed the account around 2002 clearing the balance. I'm unsure if I had PPI on the card which i'm sure they called 'Style Care' I also had a lot of £36 bank charges.
A few questions if I may?
After such a length of time am I still able to claim PPI and charges back?
If so how would I start the ball rolling with 'Style' no longer being in business?
How can I get copies of my statements as mine were burnt some years ago?
If you'd like any more information then please ask and many thanks
Mad Mum to 3 wonderful children, 2 foster kittens and 2 big fat cats that never made it to a new home!
Aiming to loose 56 pounds this year. Total to date 44.5 pounds 12.5 to go. Slimming World Rocks!

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,831 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The general "rule" on data protection is to delete data when it is no longer useful - with finance it tends to be after 6 years - 12 years ago chances are the data was destroyed, especially if the company is out of business - if your account was closed and paid off before they went out of business then it's unlikely that the records would be transferred to a new owner if they were bought out.

    You would start your investigation by approaching whichever store sold you the card and see if they have any records - it's the SALE that is the issue, not the finance provider - however, 12 years ago is 2003 which is 2 years before regulation covered them so they can dismiss your complaint without looking at it.

    Sorry to say it but I would let this one go, even if you did have PPI it was pre-regulation and the account charges would not be reclaimable anyway.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Thanks for your reply. Ive been reading on the web this afternoon. They were in business to the year 2000 and were bought out by RBOS. Theres even old posts on here found using the search button Oh well nothing ventured nothing gained. Thanks again
    Mad Mum to 3 wonderful children, 2 foster kittens and 2 big fat cats that never made it to a new home!
    Aiming to loose 56 pounds this year. Total to date 44.5 pounds 12.5 to go. Slimming World Rocks!
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,831 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks for your reply. Ive been reading on the web this afternoon. They were in business to the year 2000 and were bought out by RBOS. Theres even old posts on here found using the search button Oh well nothing ventured nothing gained. Thanks again

    You still need to complain to the store that sold you the card, the finance provider has no liability AT ALL for the sale UNLESS they were the ones who sold you the card - if it was a sales staff member offering you a card in store then the store itself is liable.

    As I said, you can try and complain but would need to go to the store first and chances are they will reject it as pre-regulation - after that you can try RBOS who will be likely to reject it as well then after you can try the underwriters if you can find them who may or may not accept responsibility. All of this hinges on whether there is any documentation left - if not then it'll be a non-starter

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.