We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN Debt Recovery and Prosecution Service

Jd1411
Posts: 9 Forumite
Just received a Parking Charge Notice from London & SE Railway trading as Debt Recovery & Prosecution Services stating that I was issued a Parking Charge on 20/10/14.
This is the first communication I have had with them since 20/10/14 (ticket on the windscreen was from Meteor)
I was waiting for the NTK so that I could appeal as I have done before...
This letter states that it is too late to appeal, I owe £90 which will increase to £165 within 14 days and failure to pay either of those will result in a Magistrates Court Summons under Railway Byelaws.
Shall I send the template from the sticky thread or is this different?
I successfully appealed against Highview using that template, but this letter seems a little different.
Advice would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
This is the first communication I have had with them since 20/10/14 (ticket on the windscreen was from Meteor)
I was waiting for the NTK so that I could appeal as I have done before...
This letter states that it is too late to appeal, I owe £90 which will increase to £165 within 14 days and failure to pay either of those will result in a Magistrates Court Summons under Railway Byelaws.
Shall I send the template from the sticky thread or is this different?
I successfully appealed against Highview using that template, but this letter seems a little different.
Advice would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
0
Comments
-
Lots of info here and on Pepipoo about that particular railway company's rather dodgy dealings and deliberate confusion between a penalty under Byelaws and private parking charges. On Pepipoo there's a robust response by Gan forcing them to say who is responsible for this. It makes a difference as liability is different between penalty and private charge. Forcing their hand is a way of uncovering their deliberate deceit.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards