We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Refund dispute with Amazon Marketplace seller
Comments
-
Money-Saving-King wrote: »Oh yeah, we all forgot consumer rights means rip people off legally if you can.
An MSE member who uses the term "Money-Saving" in their user name complaining about someone who wants to save money by using consumer rights legislation.
Maybe you think that money saving is only for businesses, in which case this is the wrong forum for you.0 -
Money-Saving-King wrote: »Oh yeah, we all forgot consumer rights means rip people off legally if you can.
Why on Earth do you post on this sub-forum if you feel this way?0 -
-
ConsumerGuy0016 wrote: »Why on Earth do you post on this sub-forum if you feel this way?
Exactly the same reason why you felt the need to reply to my post. Is it one rule for you and another one for everyone else?0 -
Money-Saving-King wrote: »I'll think you'll find the mistake was the op's not the sellers.
The seller is the one breaching the contract. If they didn't agree to the terms they shouldn't have entered into the contract.0 -
Money-Saving-King wrote: »Exactly the same reason why you felt the need to reply to my post. Is it one rule for you and another one for everyone else?
Well, no. Your only reason for posting on this thread was to have a factually incorrect rant about consumers. My comment on this thread was to question why someone with such a strong anti-consumer sentiment wastes his time posting on a sub-forum dedicated to consumer rights.
In the future direct your rants to the Praise, Vents and Warnings sub-forum.0 -
How much are we talking here? There's money-saving and there's flogging a dead horse and one shouldn't beget the other.0
-
Money-Saving-King wrote: »I'll think you'll find the mistake was the op's not the sellers.
I can't see anywhere on this thread where anyone has said the mistake ordering the item was the sellers. Can you point that post out please as I must be missing it? And while you're at it, the post where the OP said they were aiming to 'rip off' the seller as you put it earlier.
Once more, if the seller cannot or will not fulfill his legal obligations under distance selling, he should refrain from online selling.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards