We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Surviving spouse

Hi

Is anyone able to help with my question? I have tried to find info but not having any luck.

A husband and wife of 12 years reside together. The property is owned by the husband who has left the property to his children in his will. There is no clause making provision for the wife to stay in the home. If he dies what is the wifes position? Can she be made "homeless"?

Thanks
Billy B
«1

Comments

  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes she can


    Whether she will or not depends on various circumstances which you haven't given any details about.
  • Sorry not sure what more detail is needed.

    I guess I wonder if the wife could make a case to stay in the home indefinitely as a spouse even if it is not in his will.
  • g6jns_2
    g6jns_2 Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    Billy_Bob wrote: »
    Sorry not sure what more detail is needed.

    I guess I wonder if the wife could make a case to stay in the home indefinitely as a spouse even if it is not in his will.
    The best thing would be for the will to be changed to give the spouse a life interest.
  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Well have a read of


    http://www.thompsons.law.co.uk/ltext/Challenge-a-will.htm


    (plucked at random from an internet search - not intended as a recommendation.)


    I suppose the main question is was she dependent on him financially. If so she certainly ought to get something - but that might not be the right to remain in the house.
  • g6jns_2
    g6jns_2 Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    dzug1 wrote: »
    Well have a read of


    http://www.thompsons.law.co.uk/ltext/Challenge-a-will.htm


    (plucked at random from an internet search - not intended as a recommendation.)


    I suppose the main question is was she dependent on him financially. If so she certainly ought to get something - but that might not be the right to remain in the house.
    According to the OP the testator is still alive. Much better to change the will rather than risk the cost and uncertainty of a challenge to the will after death.
  • Thank you everyone for your help. Unfortunately it is unlikely the will could be changed without being challenged.

    The husband has stipulated an amount of money to his wife but not the home and she is not financially dependent.
  • g6jns_2
    g6jns_2 Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    Billy_Bob wrote: »
    Thank you everyone for your help. Unfortunately it is unlikely the will could be changed without being challenged.

    The husband has stipulated an amount of money to his wife but not the home and she is not financially dependent.
    On what grounds do you think making provision for the wife do you think would make it liable to challenge. I would expect the reverse to be true unless the are circunstances you have not disclosed.
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Under the Inheritance Act she *might* be able to made a claim against his estate, if he has failed to make reasonable for her in the will. Whether the provision is reasonable will depend on the amount left to her, and what her needs are.

    Why could the will not be changed without being challenged? If he no longer had capacity then it may be worth speaking to a solicitor about the situation.

    If it is just that his children won't like it then he would need to make sure he discussed the change fully with his solicitor, and made sure that the solicitor makes detailed notes so that *if* the children seek to challenge the will, they will not succeed. Depending on his age and health, he may be advised to have a medical assessment which again would make it more difficult to challenge the will later (as there is proof that he had full mental capacity when he made the will)
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    g6jns wrote: »
    According to the OP the testator is still alive. Much better to change the will rather than risk the cost and uncertainty of a challenge to the will after death.


    I'd assumed that the testator was dead though rereading it that's not the case


    So yes, better if the will can be changed now.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    It might be that he does not want this wife to have the house or a life interest.

    Possibly second marriage and the new wife is independently wealthy enough sort herself out.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.