We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ParkingEye found to be committing a crime

Location - The Range Barrow in Furness

It has been discovered that ParkingEye has been operating this car park in criminal circumstances. It never bothered to obtain advertisement consent for its signage under the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007. By virtue of Regulation 30 that is a criminal offence. If the Council bothered to deal with this properly, and prosecuted, then a fine of up to £2500 could have been imposed with a daily fine of £250 for each day that the signage remained. Might be nice to see ParkingEye taken to court

The Council has confirmed that this crime has been on going for two years or so

So, in order to contract with motorists ParkingEye had to commit a criminal offence. Surely, on those grounds they should not be allowed to take money off motorists as that would be profitting from their crime and that is obviously taboo.

So, if anyone has paid ParkingEye why not write to
<a href="mailto:enforcement@%3Cenforcement@parkingeye.co.uk">[EMAIL="enforcement&#64;parkingeye.co.uk"]enforcement@parkingeye.co.uk[/EMAIL] and ask for your money back. Maybe even sue ParkingEye under, perhaps, the Tort of Deceit.

ParkingEye, finally submitted an application for consent on the 18th November 2014 and the Barrow in Furness Council's Planning Committee is to consider the application on the 3rd February 2015.

Ironic isn't it that ParkingEye take people to court and criticise them for allegedly parking for too long but is not averse to committing a crime!

Under the contract that ParkingEye has with the Range (CDS (Superstores International) Limited) The Range agreed to get the necessary consent but, it seems, it just didn't bother. ParkingEye obviously never bothered to check that the consent was in place, or did know that it wasn't, and carried on anyway.

The Planners in Barrow started asking for an application for advertisement consent to be made, so that it could be properly considered, back in March 2014. Yet it took ParkingEye 8 months to do it. Does this show some kind of contempt for the law. During those 8 months they continued to issue tickets.

Under the DVLA's suspensions policy document any company that displays signage that does not comply with the law should be suspended for 3 months from access to data. Will the DVLA comply with its own policy?

Is it one law for the rich and something completely different for the rest of us


Polyplastic

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.