Everyone Loves Inacurate Transactions Everyday, (as long as they are in our favour)

bubbs

dipdap wrote: »

Evening all
Bubbs, I need your help
DH is on about getting an ecig, thought I'd be able to ask your opinions

Hello :wave:
I would recommend, so far so good apart from wanting to murder someone/anyone this morning for a fag:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
I got mine in town , set up is not cheap and you have to replace coils every 2-3 weeks i think and buy the oils

tweets

Westvleteren wrote: »

Snap

Last time I wore a skirt was primary school.

Skirt was senior school and dress was DS graduation before that 1981 my wedding dress just had to Google year Di and Charles got married lol :rotfl::rotfl:

bubbs

TrulyMadly wrote: »

I remember when there were walnuts inside walnut whips........



Or was that one of my "dreams":think::think::think:

Oh gosh TM that was yearrrsssssssssssss ago:rotfl::rotfl:

Sunshinemummy

Savvybuyer wrote: »

I've concluded that everything that is reduced (whether by pounds or by a penny) in M or anywhere else can be described as "reduced to clear" as everything on a supermarket shelf is there for a reason, to sell, and therefore as an attempt to "clear" its stock! Completely regardless of the fact of whether or not it ever actually does so, which is a complete and total irrelevance. So, in my view now, "Reduced to clear" is just another meaningless marketing phrase again. (A bit like "When it's gone, it's gone!" Yes, indeed it is - and then... it returns straight back again, and at the same price!:mad::rotfl:) We've had the M Savers Bird Seed Sunflower Mix on £1.74 "Reduced to clear" for the last few weeks. Now gone, properly, to £2.07 (I say "properly" as some stores had £2.07 showing even when it was £1.74, but it really, i.e. properly, is £2.07 now). I saw it there, on £1.74 and, in some stores, described as "Reduced to clear", and it never cleared and now has returned back to its full price. It doesn't seem to "Saver" you anything now, in my view.

Love your rant Savvy x

tweets

TrulyMadly wrote: »

Style icon:)

Just had a terrible flashback.

Can anyone remember pop sox in pastel colours? :eek:

Mum wears pop soxs with her skirts :rotfl::rotfl:

TrulyMadly

bubbs wrote: »

Oh gosh TM that was yearrrsssssssssssss ago:rotfl::rotfl:

I know:o

Zippy looked it up. It was about 1920:o

bubbs

TrulyMadly wrote: »

I know:o

Zippy looked it up. It was about 1920:o

1920:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: i have got the giggles

Tinyshoes

tweets wrote: »

Mum wears pop soxs with her skirts :rotfl::rotfl:

I have some clip strip 4p dotty pop soxs.

Not wore a single pair yet. :o

Maybe this will be the year.

dipdap

bubbs wrote: »

Hello :wave:
I would recommend, so far so good apart from wanting to murder someone/anyone this morning for a fag:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
I got mine in town , set up is not cheap and you have to replace coils every 2-3 weeks i think and buy the oils

I've seen some that look like pens with liquid in and some that look like plastic cigs, just wondering what the difference is
I'm worried it will end up costing more than if he just carries on with ciggys :rotfl:

I heard of pop sox but don't know what they look like :eek: and never remember walnut whips with walnuts inside them

Nannylala

Night night Broad church is calling ...enjoy peeps