We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Reclaiming Santander PaymentCare
Comments
-
If you look at the statement of demands and needs that will have what was recommended and why and if it doesn't meet the mortgage need, it will say way (such as not willing to pay the whole premium required)
We don't have the statement you mention, I assume I can request this?
However you mention not willing to pay the whole amount, but there would be no option to pay more even if she had wanted to, as she would then receive more than 50% of her salary as per their rules.0 -
We don't have the statement you mention, I assume I can request this?
It would have been given at the time but yes, it can be requested.However you mention not willing to pay the whole amount, but there would be no option to pay more even if she had wanted to, as she would then receive more than 50% of her salary as per their rules.
And if that is a product restriction then it will be mentioned. Tied agents can only retail what they have available to them. It is one of the reasons why you shouldnt see tied agents but use independents/whole of market advisers.
i have some concerns over this 50% figure. It is highly unusual for someone to spend over 50% of their net income on their mortgage (unless partner/spouse included). Was she really paying over half her income on the mortgage?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Was she really paying over half her income on the mortgage?
Yes, Santander take into account working tax credit, child tax credit, and child benefits. Of course the working tax credits would stop if she wasn't working, and the child tax credit and benefit is irrelevant, as it is for the children, not to pay mortgage.
When out of work claiming the MPPI, santander can't expect money for children to be used for mortgage.
Also she already had a mortgage with them, which was in joint names, and was changing to her sole name. Maybe she wouldn't have got the mortgage if she was a new customer?
The MPPI only pays out on her Salary, and it is not enough.0 -
davecarr2000 wrote: »Yes, Santander take into account working tax credit, child tax credit, and child benefits. Of course the working tax credits would stop if she wasn't working, and the child tax credit and benefit is irrelevant, as it is for the children, not to pay the mortgage.
And yet she was using child related benefits to afford the mortgage in the first place. Just saying that that kills that argument as I am guessing without using child tax and child benefit the lender would not have leant enoughI am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards