We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

How does buying a 2nd home affect tax credits and benefits?

1356

Comments

  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It really is incredible that one family up north could afford a second property for £60K and getting an income out of it whilst this would be what is required to put a deposit down on a main home in some areas of London, yet both families would be entitled to the same amount of benefit....somehow doesn't sound right at all.
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Teahfc wrote: »
    Wow, why does the government and local councils put families on full benefits in these areas ? Why london when HB is so stupidly high when Halifax and many other similar towns with nice houses like that could not be utilised is beyond me ?
    And where would all these people work? There's already high unemployment in West Yorkshire. Moving a load of people from London up north isn't exactly going to improve that situation is it.

    London has as much , if not more, need for low paid workers as anywhere else in the UK, which means it needs to house these people who do this low paid work.

    Is it right/fair to make these people move 20/30/40 miles outside of London just because HB is cheaper, especially when their costs of getting to work would significantly increase making it less worthwhile working?

    The problem is not with the level of benefits, it's with the bubble that is London and the SE. Sort that out and things become much fairer.
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • Don't forget the salary imbalance between north and south. Don't quote me on this, but I'm sure the average salary for west yorkshire is like £15k, whereas in london it will be 2-3 times more.
  • midnight_express
    midnight_express Posts: 1,272 Forumite
    edited 17 January 2015 at 12:24AM
    I think I might be moving up north. I'll be able to retire. Though as I live on the south coast everywhere in the UK is north of me.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,693 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 17 January 2015 at 11:55AM
    dori2o wrote: »
    And where would all these people work? There's already high unemployment in West Yorkshire. Moving a load of people from London up north isn't exactly going to improve that situation is it.
    London's unemployment rate at 8.1% is well above the national average of 7.1%, and is similar to Yorkshire at 8.4%

    Perhaps they should move to Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales or the East Midlands which have lower unemployment than London plus of course much cheaper houses.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10589129/Unemployment-in-the-UK-regional-breakdown.html

    http://www.itv.com/news/london/story/2014-01-22/unemployment-rate-in-london-falls-to-354-000/
  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    zagfles wrote: »
    London's unemployment rate at 8.1% is well above the national average of 7.1%, and is similar to Yorkshire at 8.4%

    Perhaps they should move to Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales or the East Midlands which have lower unemployment than London plus of course much cheaper houses.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10589129/Unemployment-in-the-UK-regional-breakdown.html

    http://www.itv.com/news/london/story/2014-01-22/unemployment-rate-in-london-falls-to-354-000/
    So you increase the unemployment rates in the north to reuce them in the south? All that happens there is that even fewer people ever have the chance of getting into employment as there are more and more people chasing the few jobs available in these areas.

    Rather than chasing people out of there homes more should be done to increase the number of jobs and the salaries of the low paid.
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,693 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    dori2o wrote: »
    So you increase the unemployment rates in the north to reuce them in the south? All that happens there is that even fewer people ever have the chance of getting into employment as there are more and more people chasing the few jobs available in these areas.

    Rather than chasing people out of there homes more should be done to increase the number of jobs and the salaries of the low paid.
    You asked "where would these people work"? Well apparently it's easier to find a job in most of the rest of the country.
  • FBaby
    FBaby Posts: 18,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    diymonkey wrote: »
    Don't forget the salary imbalance between north and south. Don't quote me on this, but I'm sure the average salary for west yorkshire is like £15k, whereas in london it will be 2-3 times more.

    But using an average to make a point is uselessbecause of the scale of salaries. In London, you will have more people earning significantly above average hence skewing the 'average' and let's not forget that public sector workers will earn the same wherever they live except for London. They have been looking at introducing a geographical scale to deal with the impact this has on recruitment. NHS hospitals in the South struggle to recruit compared to those in the North, which really is no surprise when you start comparing disposable income.
  • Bogof_Babe
    Bogof_Babe Posts: 10,803 Forumite
    diymonkey wrote: »

    Is link 1 and link 3 the same house? I recognised the kettle, then certain other similarities. Looks like it is on with two agents.
    :D I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe :D

  • FBaby wrote: »
    But using an average to make a point is uselessbecause of the scale of salaries. In London, you will have more people earning significantly above average hence skewing the 'average' and let's not forget that public sector workers will earn the same wherever they live except for London. They have been looking at introducing a geographical scale to deal with the impact this has on recruitment. NHS hospitals in the South struggle to recruit compared to those in the North, which really is no surprise when you start comparing disposable income.

    I totally agree.
    Bogof_Babe wrote: »
    Is link 1 and link 3 the same house? I recognised the kettle, then certain other similarities. Looks like it is on with two agents.

    Oh yeah, their both the same lol! I was just showing some examples of the kind of prices you can get up here, but I'm sure you get the jist.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.