We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
What do these things cost to make?
Comments
-
Reported costs by the media, but i bet they were not the true costs of manufacturing. i have worked in manufacturing and in retail and know what true costs to manufacture goods.
what you need to look at is
Manufacturing costs are X
This sold to Distributor for Y to give z profit
This then sold to wholesaler for xy to give zc profit
This then sold to Retailer for C who sells to enduser for C to give P profit
so to OP that camera would most likely cost £2 to manufacture
It was a report done by an industry research company and then picked up by the mass market. Obviously based on estimates than true facts but having looked at may similar reports from Gartner etc in the past they are generally in the right ball park
The above is also a very simplistic one size fits all. Not all products follow the same number of layers of distribution. The difference between wholesale price and retail price is not the profit but their margin as there are operational costs for the retailer that must also be factored in. There are also other distribution models that dont involve the retailer buying the products for example instead renting shelf space and passing on 100% of the sales other than VAT0 -
I didn't think it was possible, but I've found a higher spec, for the same price.
Presenting (from Aldi) the Vivicam F126.Same price, same zoom, but 14.1 MPs.
When you consider that Home Bargains are selling "kiddy cameras", with just 2.1 MP, and only internal memory (120 images), for £6-99, these (as "proper" cameras) have got to be a much better option.0 -
My first digital camera (a Kodak DC210) cost £400 - about 18 years ago - It had a 1Mpixel CCD sensor and I had to buy a (HUGE) 1Mb compact flash separately for it (I think that cost an extra £25) - I could take 12 photos on a single pair of batteries before they went flat !
Hasn't technology moved on over the years ?0 -
And yet my horizons are still always off0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards