We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Would this be feasible?

My granddad's currently 84, still fit and healthy but he's getting more forgetful with bills and appointments etc..

My mums currently having to sort everything out but the distance is a bit too far to be travelling on a regular basis. A care home is out the option because he enjoys cycling, gardening and has classical cars which need to be stored.

The ideal solution would be to both sell up and purchase a large house with lots of space so they can still do their own things. No mortgage would be needed.

Would this be feasible if anything happened to my granddad, especially with inheritance tax. Would my mum potentially lose the house or end up with an large tax bill?

Comments

  • Hoploz
    Hoploz Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    I'm not an expert, but some kind of trust could be set up so one would be able to stay in the house after the death of the other
  • Dr._Shoe
    Dr._Shoe Posts: 563 Forumite
    IIRC if a house is jointly owned the the title automatically passes to the co-owner. I think you would still have to pay inheritance tax if the figure exceeds the tax free threshold. However, the law is different when the person is elderly or infirm and the co-owner is a primary carer. I'm not entirely sure what the law is though.
  • Your mum and grandad could buy a property and then own it as "tenants in common".

    They would need legal advice individually as to whether this is the right thing for them to do, and the best way of setting out their co-ownership.

    A few hundred £s spent on good legal advice would be their best action right now, and would be a small drop in the much more expensive £100k they might be spending on a joint property.

    An explanation of tenants in common:

    https://www.gov.uk/joint-property-ownership/overview
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They would need to take advice and to ensure that the details of any shared ownership were very clearly spelled out. One issue would be consider what would happen if your granddad's health deteriorated to the point where he did need to be cared for in a home - while it might be possible to protect your mum from losing the house it might be at the risk of your grandad having less choice about where to go and whether he could afford the best care.

    Another option might be to consider selling up and buying separate properties close to each other. One option to consider might be to see whether your mum could buy a property with space for you grandad to store his cars and bikes, and for your granddad to have a smaller property close by.

    s your mum the only child? if not, then your grand-dad might be anxious to ensure that anything he leaves is shared which might make it impractical for them to buy a property together and *not* have to sell it on his death.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
  • Hoploz
    Hoploz Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    Tbagpuss raises some points which make the trust idea preferable. His 50% share (or whatever) would be held in trust while the other party remained in the house and it could then be split between stakeholders at a later date
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.