We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Salmond and Sturgeon Want the English Fish for More Fat Subsidies
Comments
-
When's the best time to plant a tree? 100 years ago.
When's the second best time? Right now.
It isn't a very good analogy as if Scotland were to start a sovereign wealth fund now it would have to either borrow money to place in the fund or massively slash expenditure because scotland is running a budget deficit which with oil prices as they are is only getting worse.
right now is therefore the worst possible time to start a sovereign wealth fund (unless of course you happen to think that scotland should withdraw funding from the Scottish NHS and Scottish schools and invest it in RBS shares instead?)0 -
A happy St Andrews Day to all our readers!There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0
-
goodness me
you are saying that the scots voted on the expectation of a single 5 year term of the UK parliament ?
even I wouldn't have been so disrespectful of the scots' intelligence: but you know them better than I,
The Tories were in power for 18 years the last stint. They're heading for 10, mabye 15 or more this time round.
And yes, asking people to imagine a Conservative government was a prospect reduced the No lead by an instant 9% when it was asked back in 2014. ( 45% Yes was a distant possibility nine months before the referendum ).What type of swing to “Yes” in the Scottish Independence Referendum might occur with the potential spectre of a Conservative Westminster majority?
In this poll for the Mail on Sunday 02/02/14, our initial referendum voting question shows a large current lead of 20 points for the “No” campaign against independence – 52% to 32% in line with other recent (online) polling.
However, if Scottish people are led to believe that the Conservatives will be in power after 2015, this lead drops, first down to 14 points and then all the way down to just 9 points if Scottish voters expect the Conservatives to be in power for many years – a significant halving of the gap.
Referendum Voting Intention – ‘Should Scotland be an independent country?’
Yes – 32%
No – 52%
Undecided – 16%
“No” has lead of 20 points
Now, imagine you knew the Conservative Party was expected to win a majority at the next UK General Election in 2015 and be in power in the UK for the next 15 years. Would this affect how you would vote, or not, in the Scottish independence referendum this year?
NET: Yes – 38%
NET: No – 47%
NET: Undecided – 16%
“No” lead down to 9 points – less than half of what it was in the original questionNow, imagine you knew the Conservative Party was expected to win a majority at the next UK General Election in 2015 and be in power in the UK for the next 15 years.It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »So all ok then if oil prices rise again are they ? Fab !!!
Well ?
Hamish ? What if volatile oil prices go back up ? There's a bit of tumbleweed across my screen at the moment where your answer could be...
Independence good to go then I presume ?It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
-
When's the best time to plant a tree? 100 years ago.
When's the second best time? Right now.If you need an apple today and didn't plant the tree 100 years ago you can plant as many trees as you like today and that still won't give you an apple.chewmylegoff wrote: »It isn't a very good analogy as if Scotland were to start a sovereign wealth fund now it would have to either borrow money to place in the fund or massively slash expenditure because scotland is running a budget deficit which with oil prices as they are is only getting worse.
right now is therefore the worst possible time to start a sovereign wealth fund (unless of course you happen to think that scotland should withdraw funding from the Scottish NHS and Scottish schools and invest it in RBS shares instead?)
Perhaps zagubov could confirm what money he wants to put in a wealth fund and where he thinks it should come from?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »Hamish ? What if volatile oil prices go back up ? There's a bit of tumbleweed across my screen at the moment where your answer could be...
Independence good to go then I presume ?
As has been explained to you many times there are two factors to look at with oil revenues.
1) The gap between the cost of producing oil in the North Sea and the price it sells for and therefore how much tax revenue on profits the government can extract
2) The volume of oil being pumped out at those profitable levels and therefore how much tax revenue the government can extract
Even at $100 a barrel with current production levels, or anything close to them, Scotland would still be suffering a financial black hole to fill from either raising taxes or cutting spending that it has no realistic prospect of doing.
At $50 a barrel the tax take is essentially close to zero.... In fact the UK government has paid out more in allowances and rebates in the last 6 months than it has taken in tax, resulting in a negative revenue position from North Sea oil for the first time in history.
If you could first jump in zag's time machine and go back a few decades to when the UKCS was pumping over 3 times the quantity of oil it is today, and then also raise the price to the sort of record highs we saw a few years ago, I would agree that Scotland's finances would look very different.
But as it stands today I literally have a better chance of winning the lottery than you do of being able to achieve both those things at the same time.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards