We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
An essay on our buying and renting problems! Advice very welcome!
Comments
-
So as long as a tenant keeps paying rent they can pretty much stay put?
No but even if a LL issues a Section 21 (surprisingly a fair number of Section 21s aren't issued correctly) it can take weeks if not months to get a court date. It can even come to bailiffs having to be appointed to physically remove the tenant from the property.0 -
I guess its an option, hopefully we won't have to consider that though..0
-
I_have_spoken wrote: »Nope. But a 'professional' tenant can spin things out for several months after the AST ends, using tricks they get from Shelter etc. The classic is for the women to get preggers and cry her eyes out in Court when you're seeking eviction. That can mean 6 months rent-free.
The AST won't have ended though that's the point. They're not tricks it's housing law.
Do you have any specific evidence of these women who get preggers getting 6 months rent free or is this something you heard from Katie Hoppkins?0 -
Problem is if you rent again in Oxford and get another Tenant in Manc you will be in the same chicken and egg situation next year having paid more letting and removal fees.
Your priority should be selling the Manc property as all else hinges on that. Really to get the best results when selling you need the property without a tenant, which means some months without rent coming in on your Manc property while you still have to pay rent in Oxford.
It would seem most sensible to be living back in Manc if possible in order to cut costs by living there while any sale goes through. Can your wife and child stay there while you get cheap lodgings in Oxford by being a Monday to Friday lodger. That way you won't have another unexpected having to move house if given notice. If you have to move lodgings it's quick and cheap. Then you can concentrate on selling in Manc and buying in Oxford.
If you do have to rent again in Oxford you could look for a landlord who will be happy with a six month initial fixed term followed by a periodic tenancy. Alternatively look for a 12 month term with a break clause. Otherwise if you are tied into a rental and you find the house you want to buy you will be stuck paying rent till the end of the tenancy overlapping with home ownership. It would be a shame to miss the house you want due to being locked into a tenancy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
