We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Building Regulation compliance - legal requirements to enable sale
didman14
Posts: 4 Newbie
My son is in the process of buying a flat, it has had one previous owner but is now owned by a building society (not advertised as a repossession though). In order to be building regulations approved the original property had an extractor fan in the kitchen fitted to a cooker hood. However, the cooker hood is no longer there - the flexible extractor ducting is just dangling out of the ceiling. Are we within our rights to expect the vendor to ensure that a cooker hood is fitted (along with working extractor) so that the property still complies with the original building regulations requirements enabling it to be passed as fit for purpose?
Can anybody advise?
Can anybody advise?
0
Comments
-
Cooker hood is not needed , the ducting is there so it complies with the regulationsEx forum ambassador
Long term forum member0 -
It's reposession. They won't touch it. It is sold as seen.
The property complied when the inspection was carried out, the new mortgage company will only want to see the certificate.
The cost of a new extractor is negligable. Knock £100 off the offer if you're that bothered.
If that is the only thing wrong, you're onto a good thing.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
Thanks Browntoa, I thought the same, as long as the extract fan is still in place and working that is - the actual hood is just cosmetic. I must reiterate though that the property has never been advertised or referred to as a 'repossession'.....should it have been in order for 'sold as seen' to apply?0
-
No, generally all hosues are sold as seen, it's up to you to pay for various surveys and checks that you feel necessary.Thanks Browntoa, I thought the same, as long as the extract fan is still in place and working that is - the actual hood is just cosmetic. I must reiterate though that the property has never been advertised or referred to as a 'repossession'.....should it have been in order for 'sold as seen' to apply?Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
Fair comment, I agree...thanks0
-
The property has no cooker hood. That's how you it's being sold.
You want a cooker hood, buy a cooker hood.
Good grief!
Whether it's a repo or not is irrelevant. The same rules apply whoever is selling, providing the seller has the right to sell.0 -
Unfortunately G_M, neither a helpful nor pertinent response, suggest need to properly read my text - other responders on the right track, well almost all.
Its all about the legalities regarding the building regulations situation concerning what is 'fit for purpose' and more people should be concerned about this!
On a wider note it appears that all house sales are on a 'sold as seen basis' even if they don't now comply with the building regs that they were originally built to, which appears to be a major fault with the system, but let's not go down that road...yet.
Back to my original query, from the discussions that I have now had I would surmise that it is up to my son to make it clear to the vendor that all legally required electrical fittings are in full working order prior to exchanging contracts unless this is reflected in the final price paid as the cost of checking/putting things right will then be his.
Thanks all, Happy New Year!0 -
Actually it's up the buyer to have any electrical checks carried out, if they wish. However the vendor may feel the price is right for the property as it is.. .. from the discussions that I have now had I would surmise that it is up to my son to make it clear to the vendor that all legally required electrical fittings are in full working order prior to exchanging contracts unless this is reflected in the final price paid as the cost of checking/putting things right will then be his.0 -
A purchaser can agree to buy a place with no building regs, no planning permission, with trespassers or tenants in place - all things a wise solicitor would argue against usually, but no legal requirement to have them all sorted before a sale can go through.
Problems likely with mortgage yes, but that;'s another matter.0 -
And to fix it will only cost £50-£150; if that's all that's wrong it seems a good buy0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

