Dark Doings on Peppipoo?

Fergie76

So every time that someone has a court case and a regular suggest they get it stayed until the completion of that case, it will be edited?

It is out in the public domain, so why censor it? It's not like it's a big secret.

peter_the_piper

Because, if its named on a forum it comes up on google. If a victim googles (say) Imacon.ppc then up comes all that is being talked about. Get it erased by the forum owners and nothing comes up. Bullying really. It does show just how much of an effect forums are having on their bottom line.

Marktheshark

Forums no longer fit for purpose ?

Half_way

Is this the Beavis case?

Parking prankster has blogged about what to do way back in june here here http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/arguments-to-use-if-parkingeye-try-and.html

Arguments to use if ParkingEye try and use HHJ Moloney's judgment in your case (1/3, Standing)


In a recent well-publicised small claims hearing in Cambridge, ParkingEye v Beavis and Wardley, His Honour Judge Moloney ruled in favour of ParkingEye in both claims

ParkingEye have been sending out the judgment of HHJ Moloney to several ongoing cases The Prankster knows about. So far, they have not said why they think it is applicable, preferring instead just to say they will be relying on it.

This blog post explains why The Prankster thinks this judgment is not useful for the majority of ParkingEye car parks, and gives you arguments you can use if this is raised in your case. The Prankster is in the middle of updating his guides, but this is taking more time than expected and therefore the information is being published here to help motorists immediately.

the fact is that the thing is public knowledge, the case is up for appeal and if the beavis case is relied upon by parking eye then this - the fact that Beavis vs parking eye is being appealed should be mentioned in court should Rachel Ledson/parking eye and co, not mention it in court

The_Deep

... should Rachel Ledson/parking eye and co, not mention it in court

Hardly likely, the blog concerns CEL.