📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Apparent CCJ from BW Legal

Options
2»

Comments

  • Ah, okay. I wasn't aware of that and she's been panicking about them doing that.

    I'll pass that info on, thank you. :) As for letting them in, she won't. She's disabled and has to use a stair lift, so I'm the one that deals with people at the door.
  • National_Debtline
    National_Debtline Posts: 7,998 Organisation Representative
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hi Khaine

    All being well, the prospect of bailiffs should not come close to arising, even if a CCJ does end up being granted against your fiancee.

    She will have the opportunity to show what she can/cannot afford to pay - this will be taken into account by the court when setting a rate of payment and in many cases can be next to nothing. If these payments are maintained the creditor could not even request the use of a bailiff, let alone send one to anyone's door.

    Dennis
    @natdebtline
    We work as money advisers for National Debtline and have specific permission from MSE to post to try to help those in debt. Read more information on National Debtline in MSE's Debt Problems: What to do and where to get help guide. If you find you're struggling with debt and need further help try our online advice tool My Money Steps
  • The CCJ has actually been applied in default because we didn't submit any paperwork for defense.

    Except we never received any paperwork to submit a defense in the first place, so we're applying to have it set aside on those grounds. We've got other stuff going in place to basically highlight the fact she's not capable of dealing with finances in any way, and we're trying to find out which debt the CCJ is for in the first place as well.

    Along with that, we're also going to be arguing that the court and company can't just go after her when it's a joint debt and will be supplying details for her ex-husband where possible... especially since he was the one that dealt with all financial issues while they were together.
  • National_Debtline
    National_Debtline Posts: 7,998 Organisation Representative
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 2 January 2015 at 5:43PM
    Hi Khaine

    Sorry for the delayed response.

    I strongly recommend taking legal advice when applying to set aside and defend a court claim, if you have not already done so. I’m not legally trained but my understanding is that filing a defence is to dispute liability rather than the fact the claim form wasn’t received, and you need to outline the grounds for the disputed liability.


    If the debt is in joint names the joint and several liability would mean either your fiance or her ex-husband could be pursued for the full amount of the debt.


    There may be some scope to contest liability on the grounds of mental health and your fiance possibly lacking the full understanding and capacity to enter into a contract. Being pressured into signing an agreement under duress, or through deception, can also sometimes impact liability. You would certainly require legal advice to clarify these points though.

    James
    @natdebtline
    We work as money advisers for National Debtline and have specific permission from MSE to post to try to help those in debt. Read more information on National Debtline in MSE's Debt Problems: What to do and where to get help guide. If you find you're struggling with debt and need further help try our online advice tool My Money Steps
  • rizla_king
    rizla_king Posts: 2,895 Forumite
    No the courts powers are wider than that.

    They can set aside if
    (b) it appears to the court that there is some other good reason why –

    (i) the judgment should be set aside or varied;
    or

    (ii) the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.

    Note the "OR".

    At it's basic level a judge just has to think there is a good reason why it should be set aside. That could be just that you never had a chance to pay it and avoid the CCJ because you didn't receive papers. After all, if you do get papers and pay before or with 30 days then you never get a CCJ registered against you. Khaine was denied any chance to do that.
    Still rolling rolling rolling...... :) <
    SIGNATURE - Not part of post
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.