We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

kathhaley

I recently read that the G20 met and now have passed laws that allow all deposits to be confiscated if a bank fails. The current £85.000 guarantee that the UK Govt offers would only cover a minute (.008% or so). Are people aware of this? Only public banks that are independent are safe apparently, not that I can find one here.

Comments

  • Uxb
    Uxb Posts: 1,340 Forumite
    edited 17 December 2014 at 1:43PM
    the £85K covers the vast majority of domestic/retail personal deposits by individuals
    You are correct that the vast majority of total deposits are those from corporate depositors.
    The safety net of £85K is only intended to cover personal deposits and those of small business up to a certain size.

    There is no "confiscation" involved IF such a bank failure took place.
    It is simply like you lending money to another person(bank in this case) who then lends it out elsewhere and looses it all though bad investments or business failures.
    So there is no longer the money there to pay you back - even though your papers may say you have lent them money and are due to have it returned.
    So either you the depositor has to take the loss or someone else (taxpayers in banks cases so far) have to make up the difference to enable to bank to pay you back.
    I repeat is it not confiscation if such an event happened: the money would simply not exist anymore.

    In practice if a major clearing bank in the UK went bust, what with credit cards/ATMs not working, fuel stations closed, no more food in the supermarkets because no suppliers could get paid, and effectively no police force I think that the fate of your £85K would be the least of your worries.
  • agrinnall
    agrinnall Posts: 23,344 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kathhaley wrote: »
    I recently read that the G20 met and now have passed laws that allow all deposits to be confiscated if a bank fails. The current £85.000 guarantee that the UK Govt offers would only cover a minute (.008% or so). Are people aware of this? Only public banks that are independent are safe apparently, not that I can find one here.

    Nations pass laws, not the G20.

    I suspect that the UK example of the public banks you mention would include National Savings and Investments (where the Treasury guarantees deposits up to £2 million) and NRAM which was fully nationalised when Northern Rock failed (although I'm not sure whether they hold customer deposits anyway) - in both cases the government is the ultimate backer, so even if the institution failed deposits would be safe unless the country became broke.
  • kathhaley wrote: »
    I recently read that the G20 met and now have passed laws that allow all deposits to be confiscated if a bank fails.
    Don't believe everything you read.
    The current £85.000 guarantee that the UK Govt offers would only cover a minute (.008% or so).
    % of what?

    Around 70% of the amount deposited in deposits in the UK is protected. Around 98% of individuals depositing are wholly protected.
    Are people aware of this? Only public banks that are independent are safe apparently, not that I can find one here.
    What are you going on about?
  • Archi_Bald
    Archi_Bald Posts: 9,681 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    What the G20 agreed on is that they want to do away with the "too big to fail" threat. This is brilliant news for the world at large, and it doesn't change anything about the £85K protection (per financial institution) individual UK depositors are enjoying.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/10/us-g20-banks-regulations-idUSKCN0IU0E920141110
    kathhaley wrote: »
    Only public banks that are independent are safe apparently
    No idea what that means but suffice to say: any UK bank and building society that is part of the FSCS scheme is "safe" as far as private depositors are concerned, as long as the depositors stick to the rules defined by FSCS.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.