We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Whos this Sekisnow?
Comments
-
wherediditallgo wrote: »It would certainly make things a lot easier from our point of view. Only thing is, the number of PMs that can be received is probably limited by the software. The AntiMartin one was sent to almost 600 members at the same time (probably the number of people who happened to be online at the time) - if even 10% had forwarded them by PM the inbox would have been full within minutes just because of one PM, which would have in turn blocked any other abuse issues that might have been trying to go through.
Yes, but by having no PM box, rather than having one issue that then blocks others, there are zero issues that then block others IYSWIM.
I would also guess the PM limit can be changed for individual users."Follow the money!" - Deepthroat (AKA William Mark Felt Sr - Associate Director of the FBI)
"We were born and raised in a summer haze." Adele 'Someone like you.'
"Blowing your mind, 'cause you know what you'll find, when you're looking for things in the sky." OMD 'Julia's Song'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards