We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Right to Buy loss

24

Comments

  • SailorSam
    SailorSam Posts: 22,754 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why didn't you buy 20yrs ago ?
    Liverpool is one of the wonders of Britain,
    What it may grow to in time, I know not what.

    Daniel Defoe: 1725.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,629 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Perhaps they do. But the OP was seeking advice and information, not opinion.

    They opened the door to comment when they described it as "massively unfair".
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Perhaps they do. But the OP was seeking advice and information, not opinion.
    No. As well as asking for information, OP ended:
    Seems massively unfair if I have given that I had no option but to move from council to housing association because of the council's plans.

    That is opinion, and as such, invites others' opinions.
  • kinger101 wrote: »
    They opened the door to comment when they described it as "massively unfair".
    G_M wrote: »
    No. As well as asking for information, OP ended:

    That is opinion, and as such, invites others' opinions.

    Fair comment.
  • Hi everyone,

    Up until March I was living in a council property and had been for 28 years which would have given me maximum discount under the right to buy scheme. However, the house was marked for demolition a few years ago with the council awarding the rebuilding of new homes for our rehousing to a housing association, I moved in March into one of the new build properties and so am now a housing association tenant as opposed to a council tenant. Seeing as the right to buy scheme does not cover housing association properties (unless they were previously owned by the council) have I lost all my years tenancy and my ability to use the right to buy scheme? Seems massively unfair if I have given that I had no option but to move from council to housing association because of the council's plans.

    thanks

    Many of us would be glad to be 'forced' to move to a brand new house.

    There are, afaik, no RTB on HA properties, you may have a 'Right to Acquire' and would need to ask your housing provider about this.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • Many of us would be glad to be 'forced' to move to a brand new house.

    Even if you didn't want to?
    There are, afaik, no RTB on HA properties, you may have a 'Right to Acquire' and would need to ask your housing provider about this.

    Depending on the conditions under which the property was built, the OP may well have preserved their right to buy even with a HA property. As an example, it may have been a condition of the land sale or the granting of planning permission.
  • dodger1
    dodger1 Posts: 4,579 Forumite
    McKneff wrote: »
    The old one was owned by the council.


    The new one that the OP moved into was HA and had never been owned by the council.

    Ah, thanks, that makes sense now.
    It's someone else's fault.
  • Oh my heart bleeds that you have lost out on some more of the hard working tax payers handouts.
  • Oh my heart bleeds that you have lost out on some more of the hard working tax payers handouts.

    What "hand-outs" are they? He's yet to become a member of the most taxpayer subsidised of the housing sectors, owner/occs.
  • Even if you didn't want to?
    How do we know they didn't want to? Maybe the last house was unfit by modern standards which is why they didn't cash in. Maybe life sometimes just isn't "fair".

    Being given a brand new house at a low rent seems like something to be grateful for. Ultimately the answer does not lie on this forum, but with their landlord. I hope they get over the feeling of unfairness and enjoy their incredible good fortune.
    Been away for a while.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.