📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Intel processors - why so many?

2»

Comments

  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,553
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    50Twuncle wrote: »
    I remember when there were just 386 SX's then Intel offered DX's
    This was the start of it ??
    Your memory needs an upgrade...

    The 32-bit 80386 (commonly known as a "386") was introduced in 1985, and the 80386SX (ie. "386SX") variant was introduced in 1988.

    The normal 386 was then renamed the 80386DX to differentiate it.

    The 386SX was a lower cost version of the CPU, which only had half the bus width (ie. 16 bits instead of 32), which meant it was slower for I/O and also that it had a limited memory size.

    Intel also brought in an "SL" variant, aimed at lower power consumption, for laptops.

    They also had an optional 80387 maths co-processor.

    Apart from that, you're right; it was all way simpler...

    Well, actually the 80386 was a replacement for the 80286, which itself was a replacement for the 8080.

    And the 8080 had competition from the Motorola M68000, which many thought was a better technology.

    Yep, it was way easier back then...

    :)
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.