We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Intel processors - why so many?
Comments
-
Your memory needs an upgrade...I remember when there were just 386 SX's then Intel offered DX's
This was the start of it ??
The 32-bit 80386 (commonly known as a "386") was introduced in 1985, and the 80386SX (ie. "386SX") variant was introduced in 1988.
The normal 386 was then renamed the 80386DX to differentiate it.
The 386SX was a lower cost version of the CPU, which only had half the bus width (ie. 16 bits instead of 32), which meant it was slower for I/O and also that it had a limited memory size.
Intel also brought in an "SL" variant, aimed at lower power consumption, for laptops.
They also had an optional 80387 maths co-processor.
Apart from that, you're right; it was all way simpler...
Well, actually the 80386 was a replacement for the 80286, which itself was a replacement for the 8080.
And the 8080 had competition from the Motorola M68000, which many thought was a better technology.
Yep, it was way easier back then...
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards