We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Renting out a room to a friend with a child

13

Comments

  • gazter
    gazter Posts: 931 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    katejo wrote: »
    I have an email from the TV license authorities. It states that lodgers must have their own license unless they are a family member or an au pair. I got it when I disputed the wording on their website which keeps using the word tenant.
    I would quite like to see their claim tested in court but they insisted that this was correct when I challenged their argument.

    But it doesnt make sense. It is not true. If you have separate tenancy agreements then you need separate tv licenses.

    Lodgers do not have tenancy agreements. Does the email from TVL not just replicate the same wording on the website.

    http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/for-your-home/tenants-and-lodgers-aud2

    You need a tv license if:
    1) If you have a separate tenancy agreement for your room
    2) If you have a joint tenancy agreement

    Further notes say the following:
    One TV Licence may cover the whole house.
    "However, there may be other reasons why you need your own separate licence, such as whether or not you have exclusive access to a toilet or washing facilities"

    The key words are 'exclusive access'. Do any of your lodgers have exclusive access? Do any of your lodgers have a separate tenancy agreement for their room?

    I presume no. God knows why you would pay for a second tv license. I could sell you some volcano insurance as well if you want.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,580 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    katejo wrote: »
    I have an email from the TV license authorities. It states that lodgers must have their own license unless they are a family member or an au pair. I got it when I disputed the wording on their website which keeps using the word tenant.
    I would quite like to see their claim tested in court but they insisted that this was correct when I challenged their argument.

    Write back and ask then where this is stated either in statute, or on the licencing agreement. I rather sounds like they're making !!!! up as they go along.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • paddy's_mum
    paddy's_mum Posts: 3,977 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    playaz wrote: »
    the reason for a contract is to make it clear from the start that should she be unable to pay for 3-6 months

    I don't understand this 3 - 6 months bit.

    Is the OP unsure in his own mind what a lodger is/does and has access to?

    Is there a danger that he may unintentionally create a tenancy with all the rights that gives to the other party?

    In his shoes, I suspect I'd make regretful noises that my mortgage company and/or house insurers won't consent to me letting out a room so as to avoid any unpleasantness with the friend.
  • gazter
    gazter Posts: 931 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    I don't understand this 3 - 6 months bit.

    Is the OP unsure in his own mind what a lodger is/does and has access to?

    Is there a danger that he may unintentionally create a tenancy with all the rights that gives to the other party?

    In his shoes, I suspect I'd make regretful noises that my mortgage company and/or house insurers won't consent to me letting out a room so as to avoid any unpleasantness with the friend.

    You want her out as soon as she fails to pay. He'll never get rid of her in the scenario above.
    We all often enter things with our eyes closed, but this seems to almost certainly end badly.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,292 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 1 December 2014 at 5:23PM
    kinger101 wrote: »
    Write back and ask then where this is stated either in statute, or on the licencing agreement. I rather sounds like they're making !!!! up as they go along.

    When I challenged it, they referred to this part from their website

    You don't need one
    If you’re a lodger and have a relationship with the homeowner – for example, a family member, common law partner, a nanny, au pair or housekeeper

    I haven't pursued it further as most of my lodgers haven't wanted to watch live TV in their rooms. I will look out their original email when I am at home. They insisted that the lodger had to buy a licence in their own name. I couldn't provide one for them.
  • gazter
    gazter Posts: 931 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    katejo wrote: »
    When I challenged it, they referred to this part from their website

    You don't need one
    If you’re a lodger and have a relationship with the homeowner – for example, a family member, common law partner, a nanny, au pair or housekeeper

    I haven't pursued it further as most of my lodgers haven't wanted to watch live TV in their rooms. I will look out their original email when I am at home. They insisted that the lodger had to buy a licence in their own name. I couldn't provide one for them.

    They are lying to you or intentionally obfuscating. Your license covers the whole house, unless a separate tenancy agreement is created, like you would have in a student house. The accompanying notes on their page are clear about the circumstances in which you would need one.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,292 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 1 December 2014 at 11:06PM
    gazter wrote: »
    They are lying to you or intentionally obfuscating. Your license covers the whole house, unless a separate tenancy agreement is created, like you would have in a student house. The accompanying notes on their page are clear about the circumstances in which you would need one.

    The actual email sent to me said the following. I didn't reply to it.


    Thank you for contacting us.

    One television licence covers the following people to use a television at the named address:

    ? the person named on the licence
    ? anyone living as part of the family at the address shown
    ? anyone working at or visiting the address

    If part of the premises is being rented to someone who has a television in their own room, they will require a separate licence.

    I hope I?ve been able to explain the situation and thank you for taking the time to contact us.

    Yours sincerely,


    The definition of part of the premises is vague. I did try to argue over the phone that it would have to be a separate flat/unit before i saw this email but i got nowhere.
  • hollydays
    hollydays Posts: 19,812 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    9 year old boys can be quite annoying, it's that annoying age..
    A bit like 13-14 year olds..another annoying age..avoid..
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    gazter wrote: »
    They are lying to you or intentionally obfuscating. Your license covers the whole house, unless a separate tenancy agreement is created, like you would have in a student house. The accompanying notes on their page are clear about the circumstances in which you would need one.
    the question of lodgers and TV licences is highly emotive and discussed on here umpeteen times with neither the yes you must or the no you don't camps ever offering definitive legal evidence to back up their respective claims

    so take your pick:
    a) go on what is said on the TV licence website as quoted by Katejo - the only time you do NOT need a separate licence is if the lodger is part of your own household: ie is a live in au pair, nanny or family
    b) join the camp that says what is on the website is misleading since the example given refers to separate tenancy agreement which of course we know is not relevant to a lodger. That viewpoint of course ignores the title of the page "tenants and lodgers"....
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,580 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    booksurr wrote: »
    the question of lodgers and TV licences is highly emotive and discussed on here umpeteen times with neither the yes you must or the no you don't camps ever offering definitive legal evidence to back up their respective claims

    so take your pick:
    a) go on what is said on the TV licence website as quoted by Katejo - the only time you do NOT need a separate licence is if the lodger is part of your own household: ie is a live in au pair, nanny or family
    b) join the camp that says what is on the website is misleading since the example given refers to separate tenancy agreement which of course we know is not relevant to a lodger. That viewpoint of course ignores the title of the page "tenants and lodgers"....

    Of course, we could get clarification of what was meant by "licensable place" from the BBC. Except, they've decided that they cannot tell as their actual policy, and have therefore redacted this document on the rather spurious assertion that if we knew what they actual meant, we may attempt to evade the licence fee.

    https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/ss/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheadername1=content-type&blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1370006220552&ssbinary=true

    So for now, we have to guess what is meant by the "separate legal arrangements" term stated within the T&C of the licence.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.