We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
OEICs v ETFs v ITs

JohnnyJet
Posts: 297 Forumite

Please can someone explain the differences and advantages of using these different types of investment.
0
Comments
-
That's quite a question and any answer would be a matter of both fact and opinion.
Maybe you could read up on the factual differences then come back and ask some more specific questions?0 -
Bowlhead will do it justice...I am one of the Dogs of the Index.0
-
ChesterDog wrote: »Bowlhead will do it justice...
Thats what im waiting for. I can hear him typing.Left is never right but I always am.0 -
How many pages of text do you actually want? Its a very long answer. Probably unfair for someone to write it all out when you could look it up yourself.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
OEICs - Phil Collins/Genesis
ETFs - Devo/Talking Heads
ITs - Etta James/Nancy Wilson0 -
ChesterDog wrote: »Bowlhead will do it justice...Please can someone explain the differences and advantages of using these different types of investment.
The bottom line is that each of the types of vehicle has a set of characteristics which may be positive or negative for the type of strategy that you might like to adopt. The characteristics will have an impact on the cost structure to hold or to buy or sell, the suitability of the vehicle for the asset classes held, the typical complexity of the fund in the eyes of the investor, potential risks and rewards for the manager and so on.
In order to explain what sort of characteristics I mean, and why each of them might be good or bad, in what conditions, for what assets, and what investor strategy, requires some context. To give context to every potential pro or con, by way of practical examples which would make sense to a wide range of readers with a wide range of existing knowledge of investing concepts, requires a lot of words.
So, here goes...
...just kidding, I need a night off. I refer you to the good answer from HarryD in post #20 -
Point taken. Thanks for all the input, I will now go away and do some research and come back when I have a more focused question.0
-
bowlhead99 wrote: »:hello:
In order to explain ..............................., requires a lot of words.
So, here goes...
...just kidding, I need a night off. I refer you to the good answer from HarryD in post #2
Tease0 -
OEIC's: funds, often managed. The most common place to find active managed funds.
ETFs: relatively limited selection, usually not active managed, or not much. Good for trading.
ETs: OEICs but with leverage and the easy tradeability at any time the markets are open of ETFs. But discounts to net asset value or premiums are the norm, unlike OEICs.
When you understand what I just wrote you'll have made good progress.0 -
OEIC's: funds, often managed. The most common place to find active managed funds.
ETFs: relatively limited selection, usually not active managed, or not much. Good for trading.
ETs: OEICs but with leverage and the easy tradeability at any time the markets are open of ETFs. But discounts to net asset value or premiums are the norm, unlike OEICs.
When you understand what I just wrote you'll have made good progress.
I'm sort of ok with what you have written, just trying to work out if other options would be better than what I am doing at the moment. I have generally always held active funds and have more recently rebalanced and have a Vanguard fund and a Blackrock tracker fund. A previous post by Bowlhead made me completely rethink my investments, which I am grateful for.
I always try to buy and hold for the long term and aim to retire in 12-20 years. The 12 years date is calculated based on when I think the earliest date I will be able to retire is. I have used a 3% increase in fund value per annum with today's values as a guide. This is probably too cautious but due to my amateur investment level I think this is the right thing to do, at least for now.
These funds will be used to fund the gap between retirement and when I am able to claim my pensions (state and LGPS). I am currently paying a combined total of over 1% annual charges on most funds and would like to reduce this.
I will continue to read up on these options, but if anyone has any suggestions in the mean time then I would love to hear them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards