We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CCJ Set Aside today

JDOG1982
Posts: 34 Forumite
Hi everyone
I have just been to court today as I requested a CCJ to be set aside as I never received the original paperwork and I believed the debt to be statutes barred. Bryan Carter solicitors did not attend and sent a letter stating that they don't object to the CCJ to be set aside.
The outcome of the court hearing was that they are going to set aside the CCJ which is great news.
My questions are...
1. Is that the end of the matter?
2. Will Bryan Carter request another CCJ against me as they have stated in previous letters that it wasn't statuted barred and I had made payment within the 6 years.
Thank for your time.
I have just been to court today as I requested a CCJ to be set aside as I never received the original paperwork and I believed the debt to be statutes barred. Bryan Carter solicitors did not attend and sent a letter stating that they don't object to the CCJ to be set aside.
The outcome of the court hearing was that they are going to set aside the CCJ which is great news.
My questions are...
1. Is that the end of the matter?
2. Will Bryan Carter request another CCJ against me as they have stated in previous letters that it wasn't statuted barred and I had made payment within the 6 years.
Thank for your time.
0
Comments
-
They can start a fresh claim. Whether they will or not depends on them.
If it happens, obviously you will defend on the grounds that it is statute barred.0 -
They can start a fresh claim. Whether they will or not depends on them.
If it happens, obviously you will defend on the grounds that it is statute barred.
As they did not attend court and sent a letter to the judge stating that they don't object to the CCJ a being set aside, would it not be very strange of them to start a fresh claim when they could of dellt with it now.0 -
No,
And as they now have your current address they can.0 -
A set-aside hearing would not be the place for a full consideration of the ins and outs of whether something was or wasn't statute barred. The judge just had to be convinced that there was an argument to be had and that the way the claim was originally served prevented you from bringing those arguments to the court at that time.
However, it seems they didn't even attempt to argue against the setaside. It's possible they have taken a commercial decision that this one isn't worth the effort but as posters above have said, it's their call. Could go either way.0 -
It's extremely unlikely they will chase it now it's been set aside; as with all bullying DCA's, once they're challenged they back down. Good on you for seeing it through.0
-
Hi everyone
I have just been to court today as I requested a CCJ to be set aside as I never received the original paperwork and I believed the debt to be statutes barred. Bryan Carter solicitors did not attend and sent a letter stating that they don't object to the CCJ to be set aside.
The outcome of the court hearing was that they are going to set aside the CCJ which is great news.
My questions are...
1. Is that the end of the matter?
2. Will Bryan Carter request another CCJ against me as they have stated in previous letters that it wasn't statuted barred and I had made payment within the 6 years.
Glad to hear you have got the CCJ set aside, well done.
I'm guessing that when Bryan Carter made the claim you refer to in question #2, they didn't actually supply you with any concrete evidence to support it? Details of the payment method for the payments you were supposed to have made within the past six years, for example?As they did not attend court and sent a letter to the judge stating that they don't object to the CCJ a being set aside, would it not be very strange of them to start a fresh claim when they could of dellt with it now.
Yes, it would seem strange and from the way things have panned out so far, they may well decide to withdraw the proceedings altogether. I can only suggest that you keep us posted with developments one way or the other.
Dennis
@natdebtlineWe work as money advisers for National Debtline and have specific permission from MSE to post to try to help those in debt. Read more information on National Debtline in MSE's Debt Problems: What to do and where to get help guide. If you find you're struggling with debt and need further help try our online advice tool My Money Steps0 -
Well fingers crossed that this is it, hopefully.0
-
National_Debtline wrote: »Glad to hear you have got the CCJ set aside, well done.
I'm guessing that when Bryan Carter made the claim you refer to in question #2, they didn't actually supply you with any concrete evidence to support it? Details of the payment method for the payments you were supposed to have made within the past six years, for example?
Yes, it would seem strange and from the way things have panned out so far, they may well decide to withdraw the proceedings altogether. I can only suggest that you keep us posted with developments one way or the other.
Dennis
@natdebtline
****UPDATE****
Hi all
I have just received another letter from Bryan Carter today, I'm guessing the courts have been in touch with them to state that the CCJ has been set aside. Below is what they have said...
"We confirm that we are currently still investigating your queries and we will revert to you in due course."
"In the meantime, we confirm your account remains on hold."
What are people's thoughts?
Are they just delaying for some reason?
If they were going to take me back to court would they have not said so?
Many thanks0 -
****UPDATE****
Hi all
I have just received another letter from Bryan Carter today, I'm guessing the courts have been in touch with them to state that the CCJ has been set aside. Below is what they have said...
"We confirm that we are currently still investigating your queries and we will revert to you in due course."
"In the meantime, we confirm your account remains on hold."
What are people's thoughts?
Are they just delaying for some reason?
If they were going to take me back to court would they have not said so?
Many thanks
Hi again and thanks for the update.
My best guess as to the significance of this latest letter? They are trying to establish whether they have any evidence of payments/written acknowledgements that would scupper your statute barred argument. Bear in mind that when they were originally passed the debt, they may not have known a great deal about its payment history.
Now that they know you are aware of the Limitations Act and its significance, I would have thought they would decide to stop pursuing you for it if they can't find any relevant evidence as above.
Sit tight for now, is my advice.
Dennis
@natdebtlineWe work as money advisers for National Debtline and have specific permission from MSE to post to try to help those in debt. Read more information on National Debtline in MSE's Debt Problems: What to do and where to get help guide. If you find you're struggling with debt and need further help try our online advice tool My Money Steps0 -
Hope it goes your way, I've had enough trouble with CCJ's and can't wait for my credit report to be of a position where I can get credit again ... though maybe that's not such a good thing anyway0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards