We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage portal on maternity leave refused

Elsie14
Posts: 1 Newbie
just wondering if you have any advice for me.
We had bought a house for £161,000 and sold it for £200,000. We wanted to port our mortgage to a house which we bought for £184,000. All was going well until our mortgage company found out I was on maternity leave, to which they said unless I was going back to work in three months they would not port it, based on the fact that they could not be sure I would return to work. In order to get the house we have had to remortgage with another company, but the original company are charging us a £4100 ERC.
We were already paying the mortgage of £600 with no problems, we had a £40,000 profit, and our argument was whether they knew about my mat leave or not, whether we moved or not, it would have easily have been paid. I feel that I have been discriminated against as a woman, why would they assume I would not return to work.? I am still employed why not consider my wage before mat leave and my mat leave pay?
I have contacted the ombudsman and equality commission, is there anything else I could do? I really don't see why we have to pay that ERC.
Many thanks.
We had bought a house for £161,000 and sold it for £200,000. We wanted to port our mortgage to a house which we bought for £184,000. All was going well until our mortgage company found out I was on maternity leave, to which they said unless I was going back to work in three months they would not port it, based on the fact that they could not be sure I would return to work. In order to get the house we have had to remortgage with another company, but the original company are charging us a £4100 ERC.
We were already paying the mortgage of £600 with no problems, we had a £40,000 profit, and our argument was whether they knew about my mat leave or not, whether we moved or not, it would have easily have been paid. I feel that I have been discriminated against as a woman, why would they assume I would not return to work.? I am still employed why not consider my wage before mat leave and my mat leave pay?
I have contacted the ombudsman and equality commission, is there anything else I could do? I really don't see why we have to pay that ERC.
Many thanks.
0
Comments
-
Many lenders take a more enlightened view, basing affordability on the last pre-leave payslip, provided the applicant supplies the return to work letter and confirmation of their return date.
You appear to have chosen a lender which does not take that view and as being able to port the rate from the old mortgage to a new one is based on you being able to meet the lender's criteria for a new one, your application and your port couldn't proceed.
If there was to be no increase in the amount you were borrowing, or if the mortgage amount was being reduced, you may be able to base your complaint on the lender not applying the FSA's October 2012 transitional arrangements which allow lenders to suspend affordability calculations in such circumstances. Many appear to not want to do this and it's becoming an issue which concerns the new regulator the FCA and many of us who work in the industry.
You may end up having to take this to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) when the lender rejects your complaint and I would very much welcome your updates to this thread, if you go this route.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Timing can often shoot borrowers in the foot when it conflicts with lending criteria.
I too would be interested in the result of your complaint.I am a Mortgage Broker
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
-
It is in my view discrimination along with many lenders, yes would be good to see the outcome of a complaint of this nature. Who is your current lender?0
-
jacobtheamish wrote: »It is in my view discrimination along with many lenders,
No business has an obligation to sell a customer something if it doesn't wish to. There's no law in existance to my knowledge.
There's always another lender that might.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »No business has an obligation to sell a customer something if it doesn't wish to. There's no law in existance to my knowledge.
There's always another lender that might.
I would agree but treating someone differently purely because they are on maternity is in my view discrimination also the view of a certain large high street building society (I'm going to stop naming lenders) Providing the applicant is still in employment and a contract exists with a clear return date, I cannot see the risk. I do appreciate there are many new mothers who decide not to return once maternity leave ends but anyone can resign a job.0 -
oh and TCF?0
-
... and if the existing lender is already carrying the risk and by moving the mortgage amount will be lower, it makes no sense to prevent someone moving house.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
-
jacobtheamish wrote: »oh and TCF?
Treating Customers Fairly0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards