We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

question about GHZ

This may be a daft question but I can't find the answer on any tech sites ( or if the answer is there I'm not techie enough to recognise it ):eek:

If a processor is dual core or quad core etc. does the speed refer to each of the cores, eg dual core with 1.7GHZ speed doubles up to 3.4GHZ in that computer?

I'm trying to choose a new laptop for DD2 and understand everything else I am comparing except for the processors.

The laptop I am currently using has 'Intel (R) core (TM) i3-2370M CPU @ 2' (I assume the @2 means dual core.)

In fact now I think about it, are any computers actually manufactured with a single core processor these days?

Thank you
«13

Comments

  • Each core is identical and the speed quoted is the speed that each core runs at.

    It would be disingenuous to add them up, though that hasnt stopped budget hifi systems for decades, as by simply having double the number of cores doesnt result in things automatically being twice as quick
  • Not a daft question at all. I don't know if two cores can work on the same process at the same time, and I doubt if most people on this board know either.
  • kwikbreaks
    kwikbreaks Posts: 9,187 Forumite
    Depends what you mean by "same time" if you make the time window wide enough - say a couple of seconds - a core can work on many processes if you make it small enough it's only a single instruction from a single process.

    For best performance on multicore processors the program needs to run multiple threads then at any given instant it may have as many threads active as there are cores.

    All operating system tend to run a lot of processes in parallel anyway though so multiple cores will bring a performance gain over single. That's why they build them. There is a smallish overhead for the operating system handling the scheduling though.
  • The speed refers to the overall speed of the processor. So if you bought a 2.4GHz processor, all the cores would run at a maximum speed of 2.4GHz when needed.
  • Kernel_Sanders
    Kernel_Sanders Posts: 3,617 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 14 November 2014 at 12:32PM
    From en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-core_processor :

    The improvement in
    performance gained by
    the use of a multi-
    processor depends very
    much on the software
    algorithms used and their
    implementation. In
    particular, possible gains
    are limited by the fraction
    of the software that can
    be run in parallel
    simultaneously on
    multiple cores
    ; this effect
    is described by Amdahl's
    law.

    That is what I meant by "the same time".
  • kwikbreaks
    kwikbreaks Posts: 9,187 Forumite
    AlisonW wrote: »
    The laptop I am currently using has 'Intel (R) core (TM) i3-2370M CPU @ 2' (I assume the @2 means dual core.)
    I think its a truncated Intel Core i3-2370M @ 2.40GHz

    That one does have 2 physical cores but a feature of Windows may show it having 4 (2 logical cores per physical)

    Here's a link where I found those details - http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i3-2370M+%40+2.40GHz&id=761

    You can find details on just about all processors in use on that site.

    Windows Task Manager shows a little graph for eash logical core usage on the performance tab. On most windows you can bring it up from CTRL-ALT-DEL key combo or right click onan empty portion of the task bar.

    Although the processor is important it isn't the only factor in how well a PC wil run.
  • Thanks for the replies folks.

    Just checked my old ( prehistoric ) desk PC (which is still running XP)

    That, apparently is 3.06GHZ and that runs at the speed of a snail. Which I suppose means that processor speed isn't everything.

    Will go for higher GHZ machine and maybe less GB of memory to keep cost reasonable. Can always add external memory and DD will only fill it full of junk anyway.
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/359254/2-8ghz-2-8ghz-doesnt-equal-5-6ghz-says-asa

    No, and you're not allowed to advertise it as such :-)
  • Kernel_Sanders
    Kernel_Sanders Posts: 3,617 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 14 November 2014 at 12:44PM
    AlisonW wrote: »
    That, apparently is 3.06GHZ and that runs at the speed of a snail. Which I suppose means that processor speed isn't everything.
    That's nothing to do with that (very high) processor speed. It just needs cleaning out, if you want to continue with XP. Or put Linux on it and it will fly, and you'll still be able to do most of what you could with XP (using WINE).
  • JJ_Egan
    JJ_Egan Posts: 20,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Memory/ RAM more rather than less .
    A 3.06 machine even single core should not crawl .

    DD will only fill it full of junk anyway.
    Thats why its crawling i guess .
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.