We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Letter Before Claim (LBC) Gladstone Solicitors and Link Parking
roboyj
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hi all,
I have received a letter before claim in regards to two PCNs (both window tickets) issued to me in a residential car park earlier this year. The first I responded to and the second I received no NTK until the letter from Gladstone. I have submitted an appeal (out of date by this point to the IAS/IPC and declined anyway) which I have copied in below as this covers the circumstances in detail.
My question is regarding my reply to this LBC (copied in below) and what I should include in my reply. I have read the guidance on the thread titled "Parking - Letter Before Action? Letter Before County Court Claim? Fight back!". Although helpful I feel that the letter from gladstone covers all the bases with regard to the usual errors found on these LBC.
Any help would be greatly appreciated and I intend on making regular updates with the progress of this so that others can refer to my experience.
LBC sent to myself (wont allow me to make direct link):
s332.photobucket
[DOT]
com/user/robbut/media/private/image1.jpg.html
I have received a letter before claim in regards to two PCNs (both window tickets) issued to me in a residential car park earlier this year. The first I responded to and the second I received no NTK until the letter from Gladstone. I have submitted an appeal (out of date by this point to the IAS/IPC and declined anyway) which I have copied in below as this covers the circumstances in detail.
My question is regarding my reply to this LBC (copied in below) and what I should include in my reply. I have read the guidance on the thread titled "Parking - Letter Before Action? Letter Before County Court Claim? Fight back!". Although helpful I feel that the letter from gladstone covers all the bases with regard to the usual errors found on these LBC.
Any help would be greatly appreciated and I intend on making regular updates with the progress of this so that others can refer to my experience.
LBC sent to myself (wont allow me to make direct link):
s332.photobucket
[DOT]
com/user/robbut/media/private/image1.jpg.html
0
Comments
-
To follow up:
I have sent an acknowledgement to Gladstone on the 06/11 asking for a compliant letter to fill the gaps on the LBCC. Today I received a phone call from a solicitor of Gladstone (no ideas where they got my mobile number) explaining that I should have sent them a detailed account of my experience up to the point that gladstone became involved. He seemed very familar with the standard "your LBCC doesn't comply letter!". Are they allowed to request this?
The solicitor told me that this is to allow them to come to a resolution that doesn't involve the courts. I am now lost on all honesty.0 -
They are suing you, not the other way round, so it is up to them to provide the information. Any information you gave them will be used against you.
Here is Gan's advice on pepipoo. It would need a slight edit as they already phoned.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=94457&st=20&start=20
Dear Sir
Ref *****
I note your email response to my message.
I find the response misleading and unhelpful.
I will not waste my time telephoning your office.
Annex A Para 2 is quite clear that the Letter Before Claim must provide all of the information required to enable me to make a response.
It is not acceptable to refer to some previous documents that I may or may not have received.
Neither are you entitled to pick and choose which parts of the Practice Direction to comply with.
I am therefore requesting for a second time that you provide a Letter Before Claim that complies in every detail with the requirements of Annex A.
Any other response will be referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Yours FaithfullyDedicated to driving up standards in parking0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards