We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

2 balance transfers running alongside each other

In June of this year, I took advantage of a balance transfer offer of 0% for 15 months, which expires at the end of September 2015.

Since then I have been offered another offer of 0% on balance transfers for 13 months, which I have taken up today, and this expires at the end of November 2015.

Now that I have two balance transfers running alongside each other, I have some questions that I am hoping someone can answer!

1. When I make my normal monthly payments, which balance transfer will this money be used to pay off?

2. What happens at the end of September 2015 if I haven't paid off the balance I transferred in June 2014 - will I start paying interest at my standard rate?

3. Does the original balance transfer need to be paid off in full before any further payments I make start to reduce the balance I have transferred today?

Thanks for any advice anyone can offer!

Comments

  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And the card provider is?
  • sorry, I didn't realise it was card-specific.

    It is a M&S Bank credit card.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 31 October 2014 at 3:54PM
    1 - if you mean you did 2 transfers to the same card with 2 offers you will be paying off a % of the total balance - though this month will not include the BT you did today, but it'll be on next month thus increasing the minimum payments
    2 - yes you will start paying interest on remaining balance once 0% expires so they'll charge you interest on the first BT you did (assuming they separate them - be best asking the bank that, that is what they are there for :) )
    3 - in theory the providers are supposed to allocate your payments to pay off the highest interest bits first so if you did 2 transfers, when 1st expires and starts earning interest the payments should go off that but if it's only 1 month before the other expires it won't make much difference as after 2nd expires you will start paying interest on that too

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • thenudeone
    thenudeone Posts: 4,462 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Nasqueron wrote: »
    3 - in theory the providers are supposed to allocate your payments to pay off the highest interest bits first

    .. which they do
    Nasqueron wrote: »
    so if you did 2 transfers, when 1st expires and starts earning interest the payments should go off that

    .. but they don't have to do that.
    Some cards will do it that way and some won't.

    For example, when I had mbna cards, their terms stated that where there was more than one balance at the same offer rate (eg: 0%), they would allocate payments to the offer which started first (even if it ended later). This can make a huge difference which is often overlooked.
    We need the earth for food, water, and shelter.
    The earth needs us for nothing.
    The earth does not belong to us.
    We belong to the Earth
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Did suggest they ring the bank to confirm that :)

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    thenudeone wrote: »
    For example, when I had mbna cards, their terms stated that where there was more than one balance at the same offer rate (eg: 0%), they would allocate payments to the offer which started first (even if it ended later). This can make a huge difference which is often overlooked.

    good point. on the face of it, easiest to always leave one BT deal on a card, and then leave it in the draw/cut it up.

    on the plus side, both deals are currently 0% so you are chipping away at the debt either way...and just need to be clear, including by talking to M&S, exactly how your balance is going to be treated when the first deal ends.
  • Thanks everyone for your replies. I tried to ask the woman I spoke with when I was doing the recent balance transfer, but she was clearly in a foreign call centre, and I didn't understand what she told me.
  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ok... it doesnt seem urgent, but call back and ensure that you speak to someone that can make you understand entirely. take a note of date and time of who you speak to, and the course of action. i write on statements so that i can refer back in the future. it's all about staying in control of these things.
  • Well, you would hope that the payments you are making, go towards the offer which ends first, but that's not the case (within banks I am familiar with).

    The payments quite rightly go towards whatever attracts the most interest, this has been enforced on every bank and building society and they must abide by this. But when there is 2 offers which are both at 0%, then the payments will be split 50 - 50 (again, in the banks I know). In my opinion, banks clearly have the facility to send the payments towards the offer ending soonest, but I think they play it dumb.

    This info should be found on your credit card agreement, if this is not made clear, then yes, take it further!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.