We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Declined Mobile Phone Insurance claim by Natwest - Compensation rights?
Options

cathy04
Posts: 5 Forumite
Hi,
I was hoping someone may be able to offer me some guidance…
In October 2012, I tried to claim for a lost mobile phonethrough my Natwest Advantage Gold account. However, when I tried to claim, myclaim was rejected because I hadn’t registered my mobile phone prior to losingit.
I argued I hadn’t been aware of the need to register mymobile phone and unfortunately, Natwest still denied my claim.
I went on to purchase a new mobile phone contract so that Icould receive a phone and pay monthly for it (I did not have the money to buy anew phone outright). However, I did not accept Natwests response to my complaintand took it to the financial ombudsman. The financial ombudsman agreed thatNatwest hadn’t made it completely clear to me that there was a requirement toregister my mobile phone to be eligible to claim and so Natwest have been toldto offer me compensation for the value of my phone (£400.00).
This is great but the problem is, when Natwest declined myclaim, I still had 9 and a half months remaining on my contract and as I didn’thave a phone I could use for the contract, I took out a brand new contract. My9 and a half months remaining on my first contract was wasted BECAUSE Natwestdeclined my claim. I still had to pay the remaining months on the contract.
I have tried to explain my side of the argument to an adjudicatorbut she does not agree with me. She says I should’ve purchased a cheap phone touse with my old contract until it ended (9 ½ months).
I wasn’t rude enough to say ‘why should I use a crap phonefor 9 and a half months because Natwest made an error?!’. She seems hell-benton not letting me have compensation for the contract.
As we couldn’t come to an agreement, my case is now beingreferred to an ombudsman.
I was just hoping that perhaps somebody could help me toword my argument in a way where I will be able to get compensation for thewasted contract as well as my mobile phone.
Natwest has offered either the wasted contract (amounting to£432.00) or the mobile phone (amounting to £400.00). They will not let me haveboth.
Any help you could offer would be appreciated.
Please let me know if I haven’t given you enoughinformation.
Thanks
Cathy
I was hoping someone may be able to offer me some guidance…
In October 2012, I tried to claim for a lost mobile phonethrough my Natwest Advantage Gold account. However, when I tried to claim, myclaim was rejected because I hadn’t registered my mobile phone prior to losingit.
I argued I hadn’t been aware of the need to register mymobile phone and unfortunately, Natwest still denied my claim.
I went on to purchase a new mobile phone contract so that Icould receive a phone and pay monthly for it (I did not have the money to buy anew phone outright). However, I did not accept Natwests response to my complaintand took it to the financial ombudsman. The financial ombudsman agreed thatNatwest hadn’t made it completely clear to me that there was a requirement toregister my mobile phone to be eligible to claim and so Natwest have been toldto offer me compensation for the value of my phone (£400.00).
This is great but the problem is, when Natwest declined myclaim, I still had 9 and a half months remaining on my contract and as I didn’thave a phone I could use for the contract, I took out a brand new contract. My9 and a half months remaining on my first contract was wasted BECAUSE Natwestdeclined my claim. I still had to pay the remaining months on the contract.
I have tried to explain my side of the argument to an adjudicatorbut she does not agree with me. She says I should’ve purchased a cheap phone touse with my old contract until it ended (9 ½ months).
I wasn’t rude enough to say ‘why should I use a crap phonefor 9 and a half months because Natwest made an error?!’. She seems hell-benton not letting me have compensation for the contract.
As we couldn’t come to an agreement, my case is now beingreferred to an ombudsman.
I was just hoping that perhaps somebody could help me toword my argument in a way where I will be able to get compensation for thewasted contract as well as my mobile phone.
Natwest has offered either the wasted contract (amounting to£432.00) or the mobile phone (amounting to £400.00). They will not let me haveboth.
Any help you could offer would be appreciated.
Please let me know if I haven’t given you enoughinformation.
Thanks
Cathy
0
Comments
-
You won't get both IMHO0
-
The ombudsman will ultimately decide. I think you are being optimistic to think that you will get both though.
As they have said, you could have made use of the contract by getting another phone. You appear to have been able to afford ~£45 a month on a new contract so why couldnt you buy either a basic phone for under £45 or a more advanced phone on credit and use the ~£45 saved from running two contracts to repaying the debt. As you say, you paid more than the total value of the phone in additional contract payments.0 -
InsideInsurance wrote: »The ombudsman will ultimately decide. I think you are being optimistic to think that you will get both though.
As they have said, you could have made use of the contract by getting another phone. You appear to have been able to afford ~£45 a month on a new contract so why couldnt you buy either a basic phone for under £45 or a more advanced phone on credit and use the ~£45 saved from running two contracts to repaying the debt. As you say, you paid more than the total value of the phone in additional contract payments.
It was £25 a month for my new contract.
I would be interested to know, what sort of phone I could've gotten for £25??
Without knowing my financial situation, how can you assume I would be able to buy a new phone? I already mentioned I couldn't afford a new phone.
And surely 'a more advanced phone on credit' is a pay monthly contract? I took out a new pay monthly contract but that's completely irrelevant anyway.
Regardless of whether I took out a new contract or not, I didn't have a phone to use my contract because Natwest declined my claim.
Thanks0 -
Why didn't you ask if you could buy a phone on your existing contract and just paid for that rather than a new contract?
If I had been in your position I would have spoken to my existing contract supplier to see what my options had been first befor signing up for something newFirst Date 08/11/2008, Moved In Together 01/06/2009, Engaged 01/01/10, Wedding Day 27/04/2013, Baby Moshie due 29/06/2019 :T0 -
It was £25 a month for my new contract.
I would be interested to know, what sort of phone I could've gotten for £25??
Without knowing my financial situation, how can you assume I would be able to buy a new phone? I already mentioned I couldn't afford a new phone.
And surely 'a more advanced phone on credit' is a pay monthly contract? I took out a new pay monthly contract but that's completely irrelevant anyway.
Regardless of whether I took out a new contract or not, I didn't have a phone to use my contract because Natwest declined my claim.
Thanks
When the Mrs lost her phone O2 gave her a phone on loan for free whilst the insurance went through. Yes it was just a Nokia 105 which you can buy for £11 but it makes calls, sends texts etc and battery lasted 2 weeks rather than 2 days. :beer:
No, signing a new contract isnt just getting a new phone on credit as the devils share of the price goes towards the line rental etc and not servicing the debt on the phone.0 -
You didnt register the phone so NW didnt pay out.
£28 from amazon
£22 from amazon
I was in a position where I lost my phone ad I bought a cheap phone to use until the contract ran out.
I agree with the others, Natwest have given you 2 good options there, cant expect them to give you both options.0 -
Why didn't you ask if you could buy a phone on your existing contract and just paid for that rather than a new contract?
If I had been in your position I would have spoken to my existing contract supplier to see what my options had been first befor signing up for something new
I did. They wouldn't do anything to help me.0 -
InsideInsurance wrote: »When the Mrs lost her phone O2 gave her a phone on loan for free whilst the insurance went through. Yes it was just a Nokia 105 which you can buy for £11 but it makes calls, sends texts etc and battery lasted 2 weeks rather than 2 days. :beer:
No, signing a new contract isnt just getting a new phone on credit as the devils share of the price goes towards the line rental etc and not servicing the debt on the phone.
I appreciate what you are saying completely but why should I have had to get a cheap rubbish phone for 9 and a half months just because Natwest didn't do their jobs properly.
The thing is my claim was declined by Natwest so as far as I knew, I couldn't get a new phone and so I decided I needed to buy a new one rather than put up with a rubbish one for 9 months.
If the Ombudsman adjudicator hadn't sided with me then I would've let it go there but surely if they are saying that I should've been able to claim then Natwest should be held responsible for the consequences of not allowing me to claim .i.e. my wasted contract?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards