We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying Freehold House With Restrictive Covenants - No Pets??

2»

Comments

  • Errata
    Errata Posts: 38,230 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    coin-purse wrote: »
    all we would need to do is walk the dog on the shared driveway, where it can pee and crap and bark

    part of me is wanting to fight this, because i do think that their ruling breached my right for a private life, i'm afraid you think wrong -
    https://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/human-rights/what-are-human-rights/human-rights-act/article-8-right-private-and-family-life
    but there is also part of me that is saying "just move on" if the management company are that up tight about pets, what is living there going to bring?

    Btw: There is also a small private area of land drawn up on this property in case of emergencies, but the management company have chosen to ignore that fact in their reply.

    Its a real shame because it is a beautiful property.
    hth .........
    .................:)....I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)
  • I do get the impression that the board of directors, all of whom are near or past retirement age are wanting to keep the estate as some kind of restrictive retirement complex. The problem with that attitude is that no young families are being given the opportunity to move into the area. There are lots of these kind of disputes in my specific area. :(
  • Errata wrote: »
    hth .........

    lol - not really, but I see your point and I did state that reliance on the HRA can be a bit of a minefield. ;)
  • Pete9501
    Pete9501 Posts: 427 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary
    We live in a freehold house on a private estate so RCs and service charges etc. I have tried my best to reduce the charges even becoming a Director for a year but failed. Enough of RCs we are now moving.

    Pete
  • MysteryMe
    MysteryMe Posts: 3,465 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'd pull out, sounds like you'd soon be made to feel like a prisoner in your own home.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.