We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
No extension completion certificates on repossesion
Comments
-
Well, yes - assuming such an easement were for sale.Doozergirl wrote: »The indemnity would pay to either purchase the easement or cover the value of the garage to the property, depending on what is insured under the policy if access were lost. The value would be the best thing to insure, but while it is apparantly the most convenient access to the garage it isn't the main one. I'd say the loss of value would be near enough zero.
But even receiving the value of the garage if easement were not offered for sale would be little consolation to a buyer who has setled in and made a home for the next 15 years in the expectation of having a garage. The cash may be welcome, but buyer then has to park in the street or move - neither of which would be be attractive options.0 -
Looking at the plan it seems there is no problem with vehicular access to the garage. There may be a problem with pedestrian access from the rear garden of Plot 73, but I would wager that the strip of land between the its rear boundary and the garage block, has to be maintained by the owners of Plot 73 who also have to allow free passage by the occupiers of 74, 75 and 76 to access their rear gardens.
Otherwise there is no reason for the existence of the strip of land.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0 -
Have you checked on the local council planning website to see if building regulations certificates have been issued, mine shows status of applications and dates for certificate issue.
I think the alley may be for rear access to the properties and not access to the garages and wonder if a rear door, if any, was added after build.
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.2698284,-2.1608791,55m/data=!3m1!1e30 -
Well, yes - assuming such an easement were for sale.
But even receiving the value of the garage if easement were not offered for sale would be little consolation to a buyer who has setled in and made a home for the next 15 years in the expectation of having a garage. The cash may be welcome, but buyer then has to park in the street or move - neither of which would be be attractive options.
The OP can always get to the garage from the from the front. This is a rear pedestrian access. They will always have a garage.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards