We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please help- moral dilemma
Comments
-
We can only judge by the effect. Many people reported to HMRC are reported for...errrm....rather a variety of reasons (quite often revenge..sometimes just out of a sense of "public duty").
However, the money all goes the same way....NHS/maintaining other worthwhile public services...and..oh yes...helping out those who definitely don't need it:mad: and taking part in whatever-the-latest-war-is:(.
That is rather by the way...0 -
Yes, it is serving the greater good.I too have a moral dilemma. To what extent is it really right to report a suspicion (no evidence just conjecture) of tax evasion? My ex landlord was clearly employed and paying tax under PAYE. Given his general attitude, I doubt he was declaring the rental income. Do I report him or not? And given that I don't like him, does the suspicion of revenge destroy any moral ground that I might otherwise claim. Can narks really claim to be serving the communal good?
You could just write a letter to HMRC saying that he is a landlord and receiving rental income. If he's already declared it they will dismiss the letter. If he hasn't they will investigate.Changing the world, one sarcastic comment at a time.0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »Maybe I'm just spectacularly bad at putting over sufficient logical reasons.
Perhaps. I'd say your sneering attitude also makes people discount anything you say quite heavily."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
-
Lord_Baltimore wrote: »And, for balance, the word thief.
Absolutely:T
This is one of the things that is quite quite clear to me. The word "thief" gets used about someone who breaks into someone else's house or purse/wallet or similar. The thing is that there are many many forms of theft and most of them aren't compensated by claiming from the appropriate insurance company.
I've had "theft" theft before and duly got compensated by my insurance company for it. It did NOT help and I would much rather not have suffered the theft. However, there are many many forms of theft that don't come under the official heading of "theft", but they are theft still and all the worse because there is no payout for the monetary value of the theft.
Right now...the most immediate example that comes to my mind is the fact that a couple of times I have lost some gold jewellery (ie when it became detached from me whilst I was going about my daily business). I knew pretty much to a few feet where it had become detached from me and duly asked in the appropriate direction for it to be handed back to me (ie police in one case via their lost property office and another time it was my employer - ie because it had happened whilst at work). Neither time had my property been handed in - and therefore the person who picked it up was a thief, rather than a normal person.
Theft has many many forms and not paying your taxes is a form of theft.
I have been thinking on about OP's dilemma since they posted and do appreciate their concerns about the jobs this "person" is providing. However, the other side of that coin is the number of ill people who can't get what they need from the NHS because they are told the NHS cant afford it.:(
There are many personal opinions as to just what the NHS should provide and I have my own views as to reasonable limitations as to what can be expected from an NHS with limited resources. However, when you see someone denied treatment that appears very reasonable to expect (eg the Aricept drug for dementia treatment or someone having an operation that will restore them to normal health) then I do feel upset personally that that person cant have the treatment they quite obviously need/are entitled to because the NHS are saying they cant afford it. Yeh...yeh..and then we go on to gastric band operations/IVF/etc/etc which are very much personal choice things - but I think we can all agree people should have what they obviously need when it comes to dementia drugs or some little kid having the operation they need to be able to walk and the like.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards