We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Private sale item misdescribed - is it worth filing a small claim?
Comments
-
Thanks for clarifying that for me, I did mean court fees. That makes me a little more inclined to file a claim but as you say she might not pay up. Although I have reason to believe she/he has the money - she told me she wasn't short of money and that she was going to get the money for me at first as she 'felt sorry for me', however she didn't tell me she was doign this, so after being routinely ignored by the man I text her to indicate that if I didn't receive any contact I would be taking further action. It was after that point she said I could forget about getting the money back, so she's basically just being spiteful and petty. I wonder if she may continue to be petty and not pay up even if I win the case.
Unfortunately this person has already proven that they have a propensity to lie so I wouldnt take their claims to have sufficient monies to be necessarily any more true than anything else they have said.
Even if they do have the money doesnt necessarily mean they are willing to pay.
I would do a little bit of background digging on them to get some sort of idea before spending money on courts.0 -
Personally id take them to the small claims court. Even if they couldn't afford to pay and I lost the £30 filing fee, it would still give me a sense of justice.0
-
Soga is designed for business to consumer sales not private sales.
There may be a case for misrepresentation though0 -
Soga is designed for business to consumer sales not private sales.
There may be a case for misrepresentation though
Not strictly true. It is designed for all contracts of sale of goods but much like a lot of it doesnt apply to b2b transactions, a lot of it doesnt apply to private sales.
This page explains it better than I probably can!
http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Statutory-implied-terms.php
However as goods do not match their description, OP would be covered (by the section of SoGA which states goods must match their description).You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards