We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Finding and evaluating tracking error

124»

Comments

  • Thanks for the update puk999

    So, are you going to be keeping this fund then?
  • puk999
    puk999 Posts: 552 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts
    edited 5 November 2014 at 8:56PM
    bowlhead99 wrote: »
    Yeah, mentioned that back up in post #22...

    No shame in not seeing it though. Usually my actual answers are preceded and followed by a load of waffle which is only tangentially relevant to the question at hand... And would you believe it's mostly written on a smartphone, which explains most the typos and bizarrely ordered paragraph that could have been better planned out... Thanks Android developers for inventing Swype rather than "tap one letter at a time", otherwise I'd have to be a lot more concise :)

    I read the bit in your msg #22 about the valuation time explanation soon after you wrote. I thought it was very plausible but missed the part where you said it was from Fidelity's prospectus. I thought it was all your own hypothesis, so figured I was adding something with my msg #30 by confirming it from Fidelity.

    I value your answers and learn a lot by reading them. They are usually longer than other users' but that's down to being thorough (i.e. considering the question from a lot of perspectives), rather than waffle. Amazed you do most of them on a phone! I use Swype too for texts and have created a couple of little messages on MSE but would find it a pain for anything more than that.
    Thanks for the update puk999

    So, are you going to be keeping this fund then?

    Yes. I feel more research is needed into how it's really doing against the index and its peers but for now it's fine. The Interim Short Report says 0.4% difference in performance which is close enough as you pointed out in msg #13. At 0.18% I feel it's a very economical way to invest over the 23 developed markets of the MSCI World Index.
  • puk999
    puk999 Posts: 552 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts
    puk999 wrote: »
    At 0.18% I feel it's a very economical way to invest over the 23 developed markets of the MSCI World Index.

    Just been looking at funds available... I suppose it'd be even cheaper to use Vanguard FTSE Developed World ex-U.K.Equity Index Fund Acc at 0.15% and have a separate very cheap UK index fund. I guess these would be comparable. FTSE Developed ex-UK would be 25 countries vs MSCI World of 23 countries.

    Vanguard funds have only just come online on Fidelity FundsNetwork AFAIK so this wasn't an option for me before.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.