We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice re joint tenancy and broken relationship

2

Comments

  • Hi, sorry to hear about your relative, he is in a difficult situation.

    As his wife has ended the joint tenancy on the current house and he does not fit the size criteria to stay there, the council will want him out. If he stays he will become 'lodger in posession' and the will evict. However they will work with him to find a 1 bedroom property and grant him a sole tenancy.

    What interests me is you say his wife's new tenancy is also joint? With who? If it is with your relative he can move there with her. I appreciate this is not ideal, but if she obtained this joint tenancy with the intention of only her and the child long there, it's a contrived tenancy.
    Well Behaved women seldom make history

    Early retirement goal... 2026

    Reduce, reuse, recycle .
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    So what would he gain by willingly leaving, rather than waiting for the bailiffs to turn up?

    It may not be that short notice;
    OP doesn't mention whether the council have got an eviction order or a possession order yet.
    It could be six months before the bailiffs turf him out, especially if he shows up to the court each time with a sob story...

    Presumably there's no S21 notice applicable, as this is not an AST..?

    I would certainly not be giving up so easily...

    There is no section 21. Even if this was a private rental with an AST there would have been no section 21 as the tenant, joint tenants that is, has ended the tenancy. The joint tenants now have a new tenancy agreement for a new, larger, council property. The OP's family member has joint and several liability for this new tenancy so, as awkward as it may be, he should move into the new property with his wife and child even if he's just Kipling on the sofa. That will give him a roof over his head and time to be removed from the joint tenancy and find a new home all whilst maintaining regular contact with his daughter.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
  • The law on who gets what rights regarding housing after relationship breakdown is complicated and tricky:

    Best to read Shelter's booklet,
    http://england.shelter.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/23393/ShelterGuide_RelationshipBreakdown.pdf
    (Sorry, 48 pages - I said it was complicated...)
    then - and only then - 'phone them for more advice on their helpline 0808 800 4444

    It is quite possible Council do not understand the rules in this area (nor all posters on free forums on't t'InterWeb...)

    Good luck!
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Unless he can cancel the new tenancy and insist on the old one being reinstated, then he should just move into this new home.

    If his wife wants out of the relationship, then perhaps he can have the new house with main parental responsibility, then the wife can move out and find somewhere else.

    If i were him, i would make it very clear i was not moving out the family home.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • dottydora
    dottydora Posts: 441 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 17 October 2014 at 9:16PM
    Hi thank you so much for the replies, just to clarify a few things. I went with "family member" to the council. Pixie is mostly right.They currently have joint tenancy on property 1. They applied as joints tenants for property 2 but some time later wife decided she wanted to end marriage and asked housing association to make single application which they did. We went to council to find out where this left "family member".
    He was advised that housing association was acting unlawfully and they have now made the agreement joint. Family member prefers property 1 but has no right to remain as wife is about to ed tenancy on property 1 and there is nothing he can do to prevent this despite being an equal tenant. He has to move with her to protect his position on the housing register otherwise he is considered making himself intentionally homeless. When he moves they will talk about supporting him. He will have his daughter 3 nights one week and 4 the next and his wife vice versa. He will not be entitled to claim anything relating to his child as his wife will be. So from what I can gather he will be highly unlikely to be a priority on councils list, unable on his low income to afford more than a Bedsit and council housing will treat him as a single male under 35 meaning any help is minimal. Pretty much he's got a raw deal where he'll get no help, no home, has to pay (which he wants to do) even though they agree 50/50 custody yet she gets a brand new house, enough benefits not to work and luxury of time spent with child. All seems so unfair. Although I do get that the council cannot provide nice 2 bed houses to both parties each time relationships breakdown, but it just seems that he has no rights whatsoever. He knows he has to move to the new property with her btw.
  • Hi, sorry to hear about your relative, he is in a difficult situation.

    As his wife has ended the joint tenancy on the current house and he does not fit the size criteria to stay there, the council will want him out. If he stays he will become 'lodger in posession' and the will evict. However they will work with him to find a 1 bedroom

    I don't think they will evict him and new GF and child(rent) into a one bedroom flat.

    Yes, the council will want him / them out, but will the court agree?

    I would still push it and see what happens. He has nothing to lose.
  • dottydora wrote: »
    Hi thank you so much for the replies, just to clarify a few things. I went with "family member" to the council. Pixie is mostly right.They currently have joint tenancy on property 1. They applied as joints tenants for property 2 but some time later wife decided she wanted to end marriage and asked housing association to make single application which they did. We went to council to find out where this left "family member".
    He was advised that housing association was acting unlawfully and they have now made the agreement joint. Family member prefers property 1 but has no right to remain as wife is about to ed tenancy on property 1 and there is nothing he can do to prevent this despite being an equal tenant. He has to move with her to protect his position on the housing register otherwise he is considered making himself intentionally homeless. When he moves they will talk about supporting him. He will have his daughter 3 nights one week and 4 the next and his wife vice versa. He will not be entitled to claim anything relating to his child as his wife will be. So from what I can gather he will be highly unlikely to be a priority on councils list, unable on his low income to afford more than a Bedsit and council housing will treat him as a single male under 35 meaning any help is minimal. Pretty much he's got a raw deal where he'll get no help, no home, has to pay (which he wants to do) even though they agree 50/50 custody yet she gets a brand new house, enough benefits not to work and luxury of time spent with child. All seems so unfair. Although I do get that the council cannot provide nice 2 bed houses to both parties each time relationships breakdown, but it just seems that he has no rights whatsoever. He knows he has to move to the new property with her btw.

    So what's the plan?
    Move in to new house with unfriendly wife?
    You're right, he will be completely screwed over, IF he leaves the social property (council or HA).

    That's why I would advise sit tight, get new GF and kids in, speak to Shelter for INDEPENDENT advice ASAP.
    Council are not independent advisors; their "gatekeeper" role introduces a conflict of interest.

    I would let the council push it to the court to evict.
    He has nothing to lose by this course of action.
    If they are going to evict anyway, I would make it as prolonged, costly and difficult for them as possible...
    With any luck, the council will decide it's not worth their time and money and leave him and new GF in the old house.

    If he moves into new house with unfriendly wife, my bet is the depressing situation will have him leave pretty soon.
    He'll be in a bedsit before you know it.
    Then no woman will touch him with a barge pole.

    As a "man with house", he's still got a bit of "currency" with the ladies.

    I would also apply for FULL custody of the child and tell the council that is the plan. Obviously he's unlikely to get full custody, but it may delay and disrupt the council's plans to evict.

    With any luck, the council will take the path of least resistance and leave him and GF in the house...
  • Pixie5740 wrote: »

    time to be removed from the joint tenancy and find a new home

    He will end up stuck in a bedsit.
    Why move out without a possession order?
    I would sit tight and wait for the bailiffs...
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hmm not sure why the OP has deleted the original post. I assume that dottydora and mollygrub are related. This family member and his wife aren't equal tenants (no such thing) they are joint tenants so it only takes one of them to end a tenancy and each of them is liable for the whole rent as there isn't his share and her share which is why he should remain in the (new) home until this is sorted out.

    I'm glad their family member isn't going to be homeless. Whilst it's not ideal continuing to live with someone after a relationship has broken down at least he'll get to see his daughter.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.