We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PPI refunds for joint named policies purchased through a single named bank account
WoR
Posts: 2 Newbie
Lloyds Banking Group have accepted liability for a PPI policy purchased as part of a C&G mortgage.
The dilemma: The mortgage and associated PPI policies were all paid for via my sole named account (I've never had a joint bank account).
In accepting 'liability' LBG correspondence states: As a final response I'd like to offer you a payment of £ and put you back in the position you would have been had you not purchased the policy.
LBG are currently only offering to provide a 50% payment, despite 100% of the payment coming out of the above referenced bank account.
The question: Is this correct? How can I receive the full 100% refund, which would actually do as the LBG correspondence said they were going to do i.e. put me in the position I would have been in had I not purchased the policy?
The dilemma: The mortgage and associated PPI policies were all paid for via my sole named account (I've never had a joint bank account).
In accepting 'liability' LBG correspondence states: As a final response I'd like to offer you a payment of £ and put you back in the position you would have been had you not purchased the policy.
LBG are currently only offering to provide a 50% payment, despite 100% of the payment coming out of the above referenced bank account.
The question: Is this correct? How can I receive the full 100% refund, which would actually do as the LBG correspondence said they were going to do i.e. put me in the position I would have been in had I not purchased the policy?
0
Comments
-
Difficult one - from one point of view you didn't purchase the policy - you purchased it jointly with AN Other
OTH you paid for it.
I assume the option of AN Other claiming and paying you is a non-starter?0 -
The question: Is this correct?
The redress is normally split as per the coverage of the policy. So, if the policy covered both partners as 50% each then the redress would be paid 50% each. The source of payment is largely irrelevant as people use different accounts for different things and many couples have sole banking facilities.How can I receive the full 100% refund
Unless the policy was covering you 100%, you cant.
Hopefully, you havent used a claims company here either as they usually bill on the full amount of the redress, even if you only end up with 50%.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
You need to get the other party to agree their share can be paid to you.0
-
Thanks for the answers ... not what I necessarily hoped to hear, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards