We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My tax credit experience.
Comments
-
IRS101... I do not know how to post a quote (perhaps you could enlighten me!):D
Anyway... I do work for HMRC:o and the advice we are given is that a claim CAN be backdated for UP to 93 days. Now I have not really thought of this before but I think it must be because some months have 31 days. However, as far as I can see over a 3 month period the MOST the claim should be backdated is 92 days as there are not 3 consecutive months with 31 days!! :doh: Unless of course they are extra generous and as 31 days is the maximum days in a month they allow this (say for claims that start mid month??) :think: Tax credit claims are calculated daily not monthly so why they dont just say how many days(not months) they will backdate for in public information I do not know
Yours pondering
SarahlouiseI have had brain surgery - sorry if I am a little confused sometimes
0 -
Well 3 months is what it says in the legislation, so presumably that's why they say it in public (to do otherwise would indicate they wrote the legislation incorrectly :doh: . So it seems very likely that they wrote "3 months" in the legislation, the techies writing the system said that doing exactly 3 months would make the code more complicated, so they agreed the more generous 93 days to ease the (already very complicated) calculation coding.
Fair enough. It beats one part of the calculation where (legend has it) HMRC intended it to do one thing, the techies did something different, so they rewrote that bit of the legislation because it was too hard to unravel the IT system. The good thing is that in all the examples I've heard (which are all relatively minor things) of where the system doesn't do what was legislated or intended, it has gone in the claimants favour.
irs0 -
:rotfl:irs101 wrote:It beats one part of the calculation where (legend has it) HMRC intended it to do one thing, the techies did something different, so they rewrote that bit of the legislation because it was too hard to unravel the IT system.
That's a relief.irs101 wrote:The good thing is that in all the examples I've heard (which are all relatively minor things) of where the system doesn't do what was legislated or intended, it has gone in the claimants favour.Signature removed for peace of mind0 -
i ahve been told that my overpayment for 2003 /04 is now their error and i will not be required to repay.i have already paid some of this money to them.Will i get it back in a lump sum or will it be offset againt overpayments in 04/05 and 05/060
-
debsc, please see the tax credit problems!! thread for your answerfatblokexl:EasterBun:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards