We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Twitter bots - would you?
cootuk
Posts: 878 Forumite
Reading articles about twitter comps, one regular winner keeps cropping up who wins more than average, along with allegations of using a bot.
It seems simple enough.
Buy a Twitter account that has several thousand followers so you appear near the top of retweet listings.
Set up a bot to retweet "win" postings that would include competitions.
Manage it slightly so you don't get banned for too frequent retweets.
Watch the wins roll in.
I guess most wins will be makeup, shampoo, tatty jewellery, DVDs, books etc, but there must also be a good sprinkling of TVs and PS4 etc
Would you be tempted to set up a twitter bot?
I guess if only winning anything is your aim, then a bot does most of it for you, especially if you are DM'd any win.
You don't even need to claim things you don't want.
Or is there a more ethical side where there's the thrill of the chase, yet odds stacked heavily against you? - especially as you might filter out many comps as unwanted.
It might make an interesting experiment to see success rates between a human and a bot. But then would you just let the bot run and keep picking up the wins you want?
It seems simple enough.
Buy a Twitter account that has several thousand followers so you appear near the top of retweet listings.
Set up a bot to retweet "win" postings that would include competitions.
Manage it slightly so you don't get banned for too frequent retweets.
Watch the wins roll in.
I guess most wins will be makeup, shampoo, tatty jewellery, DVDs, books etc, but there must also be a good sprinkling of TVs and PS4 etc
Would you be tempted to set up a twitter bot?
I guess if only winning anything is your aim, then a bot does most of it for you, especially if you are DM'd any win.
You don't even need to claim things you don't want.
Or is there a more ethical side where there's the thrill of the chase, yet odds stacked heavily against you? - especially as you might filter out many comps as unwanted.
It might make an interesting experiment to see success rates between a human and a bot. But then would you just let the bot run and keep picking up the wins you want?
0
Comments
-
I would not have the faintest idea how to do any of it, so the question does not arise.0
-
As far as I'm concerned, bots are unfair, unethical, plain old cheating and should be barred from entering/winning twitter competitions as it's a third party entry which wouldn't be allowed in most other web based competitions.0
-
-
I honestly couldn't be bothered! :rotfl:
Also I am only into these kind of cheetahs
!
[IMG]http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/<a href=http://s1315.photobucket.com/user/KathleenBywaters/media/slide8_zpse680e184.jpg.html target=_blank rel=nofollow>[/img]
Wins of 20210 -
I would never use a bot that automatically retweeted comps, although I would use an account that had lots of followers already to save the inconvenience of having to unfollow people so frequently :rotfl:
But, nah, bots are cheating...0 -
It is also suggested that RTing people may actually increase their chances of winning, (similar to searching them, favouriting them, and following them - as some companies pick winners based on 'high' influence factor, as discussed in Di Cokes article) that maybe why - with all the attention that comes with the accusations that cheating brings, certain 'twitter compers/bloggers' who been accused of having questionable methods go on to win so much.
I have never seen any evidence that RTing someone can purposely disqualify them, I cant see how this is even possible.
Rting someone's company based competition retweet - does not UN-Retweet their entry, it simply notifies them you have Rted the same tweet as them - which is a valid RT method.Wishing you all good luck!
Oldstyle moneysaving addict0 -
I don't personally see how it is that big a step up from the sites where you one click to follow/RT anyway. I mean sure you have to physically have to enter them as opposed to running a bot but neither are likely to be what the promoter had in mind when starting the comp is it?
Maybe this is just the next evolution and everyone will be running bots in a couple of years?0 -
No way seen so many people get away with so many prizes its unfair.0
-
I don't personally see how it is that big a step up from the sites where you one click to follow/RT anyway. I mean sure you have to physically have to enter them as opposed to running a bot but neither are likely to be what the promoter had in mind when starting the comp is it?
Maybe this is just the next evolution and everyone will be running bots in a couple of years?
I certainly hope not, because companies would just stop running competitions if they realised they were only being interacted with by robots.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


