We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Who Has The Legal Right To Sell House

2»

Comments

  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    rg1820x wrote: »
    Because she didn't hand over the keys, the trust solicitor threatened to gain access to the flat.

    Because the trust is part owner of the property, the solicitor should have been able to get access and so would need a copy of the keys. He should not be given all the keys.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 19 September 2014 at 4:23PM
    Your late FIL owned a house in his sole name. His dying partner had a son ( but no assets?) of her own - nevertheless she " wanted him seen right" as the saying goes.

    You say that FIL " signed over" half the property. Do you mean that he signed over half the property to his dying wife and that her will set up a Trust such that FIL would have a life interest and her son would benefit when FIL died?

    Or do you mean that FIL placed half his property into a settlor interested trust that gave him the right to live in the property as long as he chose/until death and then the half share would be used to benefit the stepson?

    What evidence has the Trust solicitor produced that he has the right to manage the sale of the property?
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There may very well be a legal agreement for the trust solicitor to sell the flat, but as you said you have taken legal advice. I suspect this legal advice wasn't what you wanted to hear so came here for a second opinion, not one any one here can give.


    Final word of warning, a legal battle will get very costly and will come out the estate, think twice before you go down a legal route you will regret.
  • xylophone wrote: »
    Your late FIL owned a house in his sole name. His dying partner had a son ( but no assets?) of her own - nevertheless she " wanted him seen right" as the saying goes.

    You say that FIL " signed over" half the property. Do you mean that he signed over half the property to his dying wife and that her will set up a Trust such that FIL would have a life interest and her son would benefit when FIL died?

    Or do you mean that FIL placed half his property into a settlor interested trust that gave him the right to live in the property as long as he chose/until death and then the half share would be used to benefit the stepson?

    What evidence has the Trust solicitor produced that he has the right to manage the sale of the property?

    That's a pretty good assessment of the situation.
    Half the property was signed over 6 months before she died and her half was in her name before she died.
    I don't know how the trust was set up.

    He has produced no evidence. He claims he is the sole surviving tenant in common. All he has produced so far are threats. Hence my belief we should complain to the SRA regarding his aggressive behaviour.
  • bris wrote: »
    There may very well be a legal agreement for the trust solicitor to sell the flat, but as you said you have taken legal advice. I suspect this legal advice wasn't what you wanted to hear so came here for a second opinion, not one any one here can give.

    Yes. Was hoping someone had come across this situation before.
    As said before, OH has decided not to take legal action.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.