We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: Doorstep cancellation rights reinforced following landmark court ruling
Former_MSE_Paloma
Posts: 531 Forumite
The legal right to cancel 'doorstep' contracts has been reinforced following a landmark Supreme Court ruling...
Read the full story:
Doorstep cancellation rights reinforced following landmark court ruling

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
Doorstep cancellation rights reinforced following landmark court ruling

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
Comments
-
He's had a long hard fight, without much support it seems until the later stages.
Well done him.
My question is this - what did it cost him in terms of his time and money to pursue this?0 -
Why was this overlooked by the small claims court "the regulations weren't enforceable as Swift hadn't given Robertson notice of his right to cancel."0
-
Why was this overlooked by the small claims court "the regulations weren't enforceable as Swift hadn't given Robertson notice of his right to cancel."
What do you mean overlooked? The small claims based its decision/rejection on the contract not being concluded in one visit.
The judgement of the court of appeal was....bizarre to say the least. They seem to have completely disregarded how law should be interpreted basically because they don't like the idea of people creating contracts and cancelling them because they got a cheaper deal elsewhere.
This might help make more sense of it:
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2014/50.htmlYou keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
You should always view a county court as the first hurdle to justice.
They are speculative judgements that are judges opinions and they can and often do ignore the law in making those judgements.
Where you believe case law or legalisation to be in your favour, be prepared to appeal .
A toast to the guy for fighting.I do Contracts, all day every day.0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »You should always view a county court as the first hurdle to justice.
They are speculative judgements that are judges opinions and they can and often do ignore the law in making those judgements.
Where you believe case law or legalisation to be in your favour, be prepared to appeal .
A toast to the guy for fighting.
And a red neck for the court of appeal. They seriously dropped the ball on that one.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards