We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

ESTA advice please

Hi everyone.
My parents have booked a family trip to NYC for the whole family rather having a big 50th wedding party next May.

My hubby got a caution for criminal damage 17/18 years ago.
We went to NYC on honeymoon after getting married 11 years ago.
We went as two and came back as three lol
I'm sure when we went we filled in a green waiver form on the flight but as he was given a caution he thought it wasn't something to declare as it was spent.

We are now due to go back next May, I've looked into it and we now need a ESTA which is an electronic waiver.

Hubby thinks because damage to property is not a moral turpitude crime he hasn't got to declare it, well that's what we thought all them years ago.

The worry is if he does declare it they may not let him in because of the green waiver years ago, even though we genuinely thought a spent caution wasn't a problem.
They may say you lied.... Your not coming in....

Trip is all paid for and we were really looking forward to going back and showing our little one around NYC .

Any advice would be welcome.

Comments

  • dzug1
    dzug1 Posts: 13,535 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I won't give any direct advice, but will give you some points to consider:


    Damage to property IS moral turpitude - or can be, depending on the circumstances.


    Crimes are never spent for US Immigration purposes


    If it's declared on the ESTA application it will be refused and you will be advised to apply for a visa.


    It's probably long enough ago to be disregarded by the US when applying for a visa


    If it's not declared on the ESTA form they will probably never know.
  • dzug1 wrote: »
    I won't give any direct advice, but will give you some points to consider:


    Damage to property IS moral turpitude - or can be, depending on the circumstances.

    I took it that it wasn't moral turpitude after looking on the Wikipedia page regarding ESTA where it says it's not. But am no expert what so ever.

    Crimes are never spent for US Immigration purposes
    Yes I realise that now

    If it's declared on the ESTA application it will be refused and you will be advised to apply for a visa.


    It's probably long enough ago to be disregarded by the US when applying for a visa
    That's not the worry, I'm worried about homeland security saying he's been in to USA once before and not declared the caution! They may ban him altogether.

    If it's not declared on the ESTA form they will probably never know.
    That's what hubby says!!!
    Have the US got access to our PNC?

    Thank you for your reply.
  • Bri1
    Bri1 Posts: 219 Forumite
    lady123 wrote: »
    That's what hubby says!!!
    Have the US got access to our PNC?



    No they haven't
  • Bri1 wrote: »
    No they haven't

    Can I ask how you know this Bri1 ?

    I thought we shared data or am I wrong?
  • photome
    photome Posts: 16,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Bake Off Boss!
    if it was me I wouldnt worry about it, and follow Dzugs indirect advice
  • peachyprice
    peachyprice Posts: 22,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 8 September 2014 at 9:41AM
    lady123 wrote: »
    That's what hubby says!!!
    Have the US got access to our PNC?

    Thank you for your reply.

    No they haven't.

    The only shared information is for people on the no-fly list and known terrorists, international drugs dealers, organised crime members, serial killers and the like, not people like your OH.

    If they stop someone going through immigration because they look shifty they can then request information from the UK, but this information isn't linked automatically in any way to your passport so it won't pop up in front of them when they scan your passport.

    Most people who get refused entry because of a police record in the UK are either stopped because they are acting suspiciously or pure bad luck at being stopped at random.
    Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear
  • Thank you for your advice guys, it's much appreciated.

    It was a daft caution for something he didn't even do but was there when a window was broken with friends, when he woke up the next day he just accepted the caution because he was there and it was wrong.
    Paid for the window, well his friend did seeing he done it, lol and that was that.

    When we went on honeymoon he didn't even think about it because in the uk it was spent, probably would only show up on an enhanced check anyway but we were still a little worried.

    Thanks to all for your comments and advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.