1990s mis-sold PPI - prospects

[Deleted User]

addedvaluebob wrote: »

Forget this, lump sum up front PPI is completely unsupportable, you incur unnecessary initial costs and then interest on the amount charged. It is very disappointing to see such comments on here suggesting it would be an easy rejection

I nowhere said front-loaded PPI was an "easy rejection". If you read the thread properly, you will see that I was responding to the OP saying that her complaint was she was told that the PPI was a requirement. It was this I said was a "hearsay" easy rejection.

If you also read post #5, I actually tell the OP to make front loading the basis of her complaint.

Please use the quote button rather than italics when you post. Otherwise it's difficult to tell where your posts actually start!

hiddenmission

Thanks for the follow ups. I'll look at the ombudsman website, and take on board your advice.


I'll also post the results up in due course.

Orville

sun73 wrote: »

Your wife can claim from as far back as 1990, I had one upheld from 1991

If you don't mind me asking was it a bank and if so Which one?.