We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Verified by Visa - confused
Comments
-
InsideInsurance wrote: »I suspect the proposal would be to effectively leave the VBV in place but replace passwords etc either as directly entering the pin or using the Sign or such on the existing Pin Sentry
Did see a prototype where the "PinSentry" was built into the card itself, was only a mill or two thicker than a normal card with a semi flexible LCD type panel built into it. Dont know what happened to that idea, guess production costs
This thing is though unless the retailer is using VBV, M/Securecode or Amex SafeKey they are liable for the fraud. The banks are probably quite happy keeping it like that. Making 3D secure as awkward as possible will mean retailers won't use it and the banks can blame the retailer. Maybe I'm just being cynical.0 -
reclusive46 wrote: »This thing is though unless the retailer is using VBV, M/Securecode or Amex SafeKey they are liable for the fraud. The banks are probably quite happy keeping it like that. Making 3D secure as awkward as possible will mean retailers won't use it and the banks can blame the retailer. Maybe I'm just being cynical.
I work in this field now and I've done A/B testing on checkouts with VBV - and we did see a fall in conversion when it was turned on.
However, there was a corresponding fall in fraud too, that made a difference. But it wasn't the entire fall (can't recall the exact numbers right now). However, our finance department worked out that it increased profit overall (yes - lower income, but lower costs too).
Making VBV more difficult with having to get the card out ... sign a transaction etc ... will just cause even more abandonment and retailers will ignore it.
Heck - I have an HSBC account - and I don't login through the main site because it requires the calculator - but their tablet app (that does almost everything I need) will use a password and memorable word. It's just a faff when you want to check your balance - and if I'm going to buy a £2 cable from Amazon - I don't want to have to go through all that.
(Not that Amazon uses VBV - but that's not the point of that comment).
M.0 -
InsideInsurance wrote: »I suspect the proposal would be to effectively leave the VBV in place but replace passwords etc either as directly entering the pin or using the Sign or such on the existing Pin Sentry
Did see a prototype where the "PinSentry" was built into the card itself, was only a mill or two thicker than a normal card with a semi flexible LCD type panel built into it. Dont know what happened to that idea, guess production costs
On that latter point - it's the most likely route for sorting this out ... but yes - it costs - and there would be higher (more frequent) replacement costs on the cards as batteries ran out and the buttons failing etc ... and the cost of changing all those pin pad slots that expect a card precisely x mm thick etc.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards